Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

255

(post is archived)

[–] • 9 pts

I prefere this one (i.kym-cdn.com)

[–] • 4 pts

me too (pbs.twimg.com) but im just a goat fucker

[–] • 0 pt

Wrong.

The low IQ moslems don't hate the Jews. Look at what ISIS soldiers got. Free yazidi sex slaves and a retirement plan in an apartment in central Stockholm or Berlin paid for by the local ZOG. The low IQ moslems are apologizing for accidentally attacking Israeli troops. The high IQ moslems who hate the kikes will never be allowed to have a platform and you will never hear about them.

There are no low IQ people who hate jews. Low IQ people are the easiest to brainwash by mainstream media and all mainstream media is kiked.

[–] • 1 pt
[–] • 6 pts

Holy Shit!

This may be accurate!

When I was 7, my IQ was tested at school, and I measured 135+ (because that was as high as their testing shit went); and they sent a letter home, and talked to my parents about me being “tested further.” But that never happened.

And I’m teetering on being a Fuck Trump Nazi.

Neat!

[–] [deleted] • 5 pts

What a coincidence, when I was 135, my nursing home tested my IQ and found it to be 7. Those were heady days, it was the Bicentennial, and the tall ships were in New York Harbor.

[–] • 3 pts

Sounds like your vampire minion did not properly care for your coffin. Or maybe you were in torpor when they tested you. Quel dommage!

[–] • 2 pts

Ah, Back in Rome, A.D. 135, I scored a total of IQ on the standard test. I was Promoted to Centurion.

[–] • 4 pts

When I was I was 7 a kid told me santa clause wasn’t real so I punched him in the face. Then his brother got mad so I also punched him in the face.

[–] • 4 pts

Awesome!

When I was 7 years old, I got pissed off at my 12 year old brother, and told him Santa was all a hoax; and he openly wept, comme ca: “Boo! Hoo! Hoo!” (fists in eyes) in the friggin mall, and never forgave me.

Good times!

[–] • 6 pts

You know how people wake up tired and groggy and confused? One time when I was a kid, it was July or something, nowhere near Christmas. I ran into my sisters room in the middle of the night and I shook her awake. I said “Santa came, come look at your presents! Hurry look he at everything he brought!” It took her a second to wake up then she jumped up all excited and smiling and ran down the stairs. Then she saw the empty living room. I remember the way she just stared at it then looked at me confused then disappointed. She says it’s not Christmas. Went back upstairs. She still thinks it’s hilarious.

[–] • 2 pts

I usually get between 130 and 140, but I don't think I've ever been properly tested. I remember always acing the spatial reasoning tests.

[–] • 4 pts

Trump already made his contribution back in 2016, he was the catalyst for a large segment of the population snapping out of the MSM narrative. Imagine what the world would be like today if Trump hadn't run and a big segment of people still "believed" CNN.

What Trump has done since then didn't really matter because it's not about Trump anymore. Trump was just the catalyst that set some things in motion that are much bigger than he is.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

Yes. People certainly needed a politician who used to be a game show host to explain to us the government is corrupt. And then, while he’s in the big chair, make everything progressively worse for four years. Boy was that helpful. Awesome.

[–] • 2 pts

It was helpful in that it reminded white people that they didn't need to constantly apologise to the left.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Except Trump wasn't just a game show host. He turned down the Apprentice concept due to being too busy managing a company, until the producer came up with a concept where he could just pop in for a few minutes per episode.

So if Trump was an irrelevant nobody before that, why on earth would the producer of the TV show have wanted Trump's face on it to make the show successful?

You can't answer that question because in your revisionist history of the world, he was purely a game show host and never existed before that. You sure have a bit of a chicken and egg dilemma now, don't you?

If course once he got elected he was a disappointment. You totally misread the point I made. I said Trump's campaign catalyzed a change. If you understood what the word "catalyst" meant you'd see that your stock reply is 100% irrelevant to the point i made

[–] • 2 pts

Do one with biden supporters, with 0 iq for the dead that voted for him and then 20 for the highest iq retards that support this puppet fuck.

[–] • 1 pt

dead peepo (i.imgflip.com)

[–] • 0 pt

Post that shit, I'll upvote it.

[–] • 2 pts

Well shit, now I'm not sure which end I'm on.

[–] • 0 pt

The end that can't tie their shoelaces - oh wait, that is both ends!

[–] • 1 pt

Now THAT'S a meta meme.

[–] • 1 pt

Trump is a piece of shit, but he is the least corrupt politician in our lifetime. All fuck trump retards are sheep.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt (edited )

I agree he’s pretty clean by political standard. He’s also a complete fucking failure. People have to invent things like “waking people up” to excuse his complete and colossal cataclysmic failure of an administration.

You have grown adults literally claiming that we are getting secret messages on the Internet, to try and explain how he’s not a failure and that every time it appears that we are losing, it’s because were actually winning, and every time we have a small victory, it’s a huge victory and that celebrities and politicians have been killed in secret trials conducted by the military and replaced with clones and actors. That’s how far we have to go to find people who still think that dumb motherfucker actually did something.

[–] • 0 pt

Q tards are not representative of Trump supporters or Republicans.

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

I am part of the .13% Sig Heil!

[–] • 0 pt

To all the “geniuses” in this thread with 130+ IQs… why are you all broke if so smart?

[–] • 0 pt

Because with intelligence comes an enlightened view of the world. The uber-intelligent see the world more like Mills, Thoreau and Kaczynski than Marx, Rockefeller and Gates/Bezos/Musk. Money isn't motivation at that level.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Sure, but struggling to pay bills and wage cucking 80% of your life away isn’t “enlightened” either.

A smart person can easily use the system to earn enough for their means, half the people on here are in debt and wagecucking their lives away while claiming “130 IQs” lol.

[–] • 0 pt

Add an AnCap in there even further to the right that understood that Trump was a problem the entire time. I told you all during the primaries. Do you know who wouldn't have given money to Israel? There is only one who was in that primary.

[–] • 1 pt

The problem with AnCaps, libertarians, et al, is they have no real organization or driving force for their political will. So they are easily marginalized and ignored until their country is destroyed.

This is coming from a former libertarian.

[–] • 2 pts (edited )

You will find that the people who form breakaway communities or go off-grid align far more with libertarianism than cuckservatism or natsoc or America First or whatever. Because getting things done starts with yourself and your relationship to the state and your community. The problem all these political ideologies have is that they're fighting to try to and take power and that is an unrealistic goal. Revolutions almost never happen organically. People who believe in reforming the state are a lost cause, and that includes most of the right, they just don't get it.

The only right wing community that seems to understand this are the neo-reactionaries, who themselves include many libertarians.

[–] • 2 pts (edited )

The main potential base of the libertarians is under-40 males disaffected with the right and eagerly buying preps like squirrels preparing for the piss-earth apocalypse while doing fuck all when they have the opportunity to change history, and bitter 20-30 something moderate leftwingers who gave up their radicalism in exchange for nihilism disguised as humor, like a tranny's dress returned to walmart after a night out on the town.

Thats libertatrianism in a nutshell. Small enough to be manageable for the state. Large enough to be a minor thorn in the state's side.

Build 50 parties, each with two or three issues they hold sacred, and use those to splinter the major parties, and then come talk about libertarianism.

Small but effective strategies are like bullets.

One is good. Having many variations of the same is better.

One makes a good example. Many makes a war or political campaign.

In that regard libertarians only serve as a good example: A good example of what would work if it was treated as a mass strategy, and a good example of what failure looks like from lack of people willing to organize and scale up.

Herein is fools gold. Maybe somebody will buy it. Maybe lots of people will buy it.

If theres anyone willing to sell it.

[–] • 0 pt

This graph leaves out the midwits, 115 - 135 or so. These are the people clever enough to understand concepts, but not clever enough to criticize them, like a cat that climbs a tree and then needs to be rescued by the fire service. These are the people Orwell was thinking of when he remarked that “There are some ideas so absurd that only an intellectual could believe them.” They have spent their entire lives being slightly cleverer than their peers and then have gone on to achieve credentials and well paying jobs. This convinces them that they are the masters of the universe. These imbeciles are invariably leftists.