> Wherever Jews have won influence they have taught men to make finer distinctions, more rigorous inferences, and to write in a more luminous and cleanly fashion In otherwords "learn from your enemies", and thats a bad thing why? The distinction, before you attempt to make it, is we have learned from *apparent allies* up until very recently. And while formerly they taught the truth of nationalism, even for the semites wretched own purposes, for the last several decades they have done the opposite. Or would you debate against nationalism, and against that it is good? But of course, you will instead perhaps attempt to about the question by getting into the weeds instead of answering directly. Or argue about who taught that nationalism, the messenger. Or argue about nationalisms roots. But never about nationalism itself. So out with it. Are you, for or against. Clear answers now. Simple. I'll give you ten words and no more for an answer. State your assertion. Arguments come after. You refuse, regardless the argument, regardless the excuse, regardless of the deflection or objection, no matter, then you refuse to clearly state your position at all and all of us are in our right to dismiss you for a philistine or a pharisee with no moral substance to yourself or argument.