![There's an easy way to tell if CRT is racist or not. [700x800 - 829KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/BMkS0g.png){kind=link}
Appealing to that higher moral authority is what built Western civilization in the first place. It's what builds communities and pushes people to create beautiful works of art, beautiful architecture, solid families. It's what people will fight ferociously until their last dying breath to protect.
National Socialists are myopic and view the entire world through a very narrow 100 year lense. It's like putting your nose up to a painting and trying to construct an image based on a few paint splatters, it's fucking stupid.
You have to stand back and look at the entirety of the painting, the image constructed from the thousands of paint splotches, and then it makes perfect sense.
Like the fact that National Socialists had a love affair with Nietzsche, a philosopher of the enlightenment (which was absolutely Jewish subversion) who worshipped Jews, hated Christianity, and said Germany should expell all of the antisemites and bend the knee to Judaism. This is the voice of National Socialism, they literally copy and pasted large swathes of this faggots philosophy into their mission statement, like his theory of the Ubermensch.
I pointed this out to you in our last conversation and you changed the subject to arguing about word definitions for some fucking reason. Any time I bring up these valid critiques national socialists just dig their heels in and scream "faggot" or do anything else to derail the conversation and avoid the subject matter. It reminds me exactly of Hitler's description of arguing with Jews, and sometimes national socialists will even openly admit they adopt the tactics of the Jews to "fight fire with fire".
Which is even essentially what you're advocating for right now
mission statement, like his theory of the Ubermensch.
It does not matter who speaks the truth, only that it is the truth.
Anyone that believes otherwise is a fool.
Say you are a boomer without saying you are a boomer. You always get so close u/Trash_Panda. I'm beginning to think that you just enjoy well poisoning, Moeshe. Christcucks gonna christcuck. So tell us (((fellow fren))), which jewish rulebook should we be following?
I'm not a boomer. And Western civilization is built on a tradition of spirited, honest discourse and thoughtful philosophical insight. I.E. the exact opposite of everything you do. But since we're on the topic of "Jewish rulebooks" here are some more excerpts from the philosophy National Socialism is built on, that you never want to address for some bizarre reason
Incidentally, Europe owes the Jews no small thanks for making people think more logically and for establishing cleanlier intellectual habits — nobody more so than the Germans who are a lamentably déraisonnable race who to this day are still in need of having their “heads washed” first. Wherever Jews have won influence they have taught men to make finer distinctions, more rigorous inferences, and to write in a more luminous and cleanly fashion; their task was ever to bring a people “to listen to reason.”
— The Gay Science, §348 (Walter Kaufmann translation, 1974)
Nietzsche then went on to describe the overwhelming Jewish over-representation in all fields including finance, academia, law, medicine and more. He uses this as evidence that they are a superior and strong race, and that the naysayers in Europe (namely Germany) should be expelled
“they want and wish rather…to be absorbed and assimilated by Europe…; and this bent and impulse…should be noted well and accommodated: to that end it might be useful and fair to expel the anti-Semitic screamers from the country.”
Given Nietzsche's avid hatred for Christianity it seems like you certainly are a devoted disciple. You argue like a Jew, you deflect like a Jew, you follow an ideology built on a Jewish worshipping philosopher who's goal was to unite Germany and the Jews against Christianity. You check every single box.
Here's some further reading on Nietzsche and the relationship to Hitler's Germany (marcuse.faculty.history.ucsb.edu) and how this Jew loving self-proclaimed antichrist became the gospel of National Socialism.
He may as well be the Jesus of the Nazi party, which is fucking hilarious.
Wherever Jews have won influence they have taught men to make finer distinctions, more rigorous inferences, and to write in a more luminous and cleanly fashion
In otherwords "learn from your enemies", and thats a bad thing why?
The distinction, before you attempt to make it, is we have learned from apparent allies up until very recently. And while formerly they taught the truth of nationalism, even for the semites wretched own purposes, for the last several decades they have done the opposite.
Or would you debate against nationalism, and against that it is good?
But of course, you will instead perhaps attempt to about the question by getting into the weeds instead of answering directly. Or argue about who taught that nationalism, the messenger. Or argue about nationalisms roots.
But never about nationalism itself.
So out with it. Are you, for or against.
Clear answers now. Simple.
I'll give you ten words and no more for an answer. State your assertion. Arguments come after.
You refuse, regardless the argument, regardless the excuse, regardless of the deflection or objection, no matter, then you refuse to clearly state your position at all and all of us are in our right to dismiss you for a philistine or a pharisee with no moral substance to yourself or argument.
That guy is further reading? (michaelkalish.com) Who cites four jews on which he base his understanding of nazi ideology and mein kampf?
lmao
your "further reading" link is bullshit. There are quotes from "Will to Power", which is a fake book published by nietzsches sister to becomes endeared to some of those kind of nationalists nietzsche was disgusted of. Besides, it's published under one "Harold Marcuse (en.wikipedia.org)", which is the grandson of one ((( Herbert Marcuse (en.wikipedia.org) ))), e.g. on of the (((inventors))) of the critical theory e.g. cultural marxism. For this you should feel ashamed.
If you want some critical essays about nietzsche written by someone who doesn't like hitler, use those:
https://www.commentarymagazine.com/articles/thomas-mann/nietzsche-in-the-light-of-modern-experience/
The guy who wrote them was an open traitor during WW2, and later emigrated into the US, where he was called one of the foremost apologies for stalin. But at least he isn't related to a kike that invented critical theory.
(post is archived)