![There's an easy way to tell if CRT is racist or not. [700x800 - 829KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/BMkS0g.png){kind=link}
your "further reading" link is bullshit. There are quotes from "Will to Power", which is a fake book published by nietzsches sister to becomes endeared to some of those kind of nationalists nietzsche was disgusted of. Besides, it's published under one "Harold Marcuse (en.wikipedia.org)", which is the grandson of one ((( Herbert Marcuse (en.wikipedia.org) ))), e.g. on of the (((inventors))) of the critical theory e.g. cultural marxism. For this you should feel ashamed.
If you want some critical essays about nietzsche written by someone who doesn't like hitler, use those:
https://www.commentarymagazine.com/articles/thomas-mann/nietzsche-in-the-light-of-modern-experience/
The guy who wrote them was an open traitor during WW2, and later emigrated into the US, where he was called one of the foremost apologies for stalin. But at least he isn't related to a kike that invented critical theory.
Everything you're saying is over my head but I'll look into it. I don't have enough knowledge about it to "feel ashamed". I appreciate you sharing your insights though, and I'm not really eager to listen to Stalin's favorite apologist.
Isn't this the entire point though? My understanding is his sister was editorializing his writings to make it sound more nationalist than it actually was. As you said, "to becomes endeared to some of those kind of nationalists nietzsche was disgusted of". This is literally what the "further reading" describes, is it not? I'm confused what you're critiquing.
Also, isn't this even more damning evidence for my point? You're saying that his sister, who leeched off Nietsche's writings to become a prominent nationalist figure, these same nationalist writings were published by cultural marxists? How would this be reconciled through a National Socialist interpretation? That sounds even worse
I'm critiquing using an article, that has been published under someone with the surname "Marcuse", as a source. The Frankfurt School are the kikes that have invented the degeneracy known as cultural marxism. I think that you don't know what that is, and I'd suggest looking it up.
Besides, the Frankfurt School exists post-1945. It's made up of kikes that fled from the nazis, and now are subverting the west for communism via the cultural route, after the example of the soviet union made it impossible to argue for communism by it's merit.
And you shouldn't put the nationalists Nietzsche was disgusted by into the same category as hitler.
European rightwingers really are the worst scum imaginable. The part of the european right wing that's not accused of being genocidal is and always has been pretty much like any socialist-niggers-party in africa, in which the friends of some politician get all the public money, and politicians choose his friends from among their fellow drunkyards. European rightwing parties are huge gatherings for cocksuckers looking for an opportunity to get drunk with someone who's making decisions, so that they can suck him off in exchange for some public spending. It's pure corruption created by and for literal Untermenschen whose most important occupation is to drown their liver in ethanol while sucking off some fat scum in a position of power. This is and always has been the case.
European rightwingers hate Hitler, because Hitler saw them for what they were, and treated them accordingly. Or at least he planned to.
The Frankfurt School are the kikes that have invented the degeneracy known as cultural marxism. I think that you don't know what that is, and I'd suggest looking it up.
You're kidding right? This is shit boomers rant about on Facebook. Of course I know what this is. My normie Mom talks about this.
I'm critiquing using an article, that has been published under someone with the surname "Marcuse", as a source.
So this isn't based on any actual information you take issue with from the page? I picked this source from reverse searching information I already knew. If the information is accurate I don't particularly care who the publisher is. And cultural Marxism is just communism engineered for the West. I don't see how Stalin's favorite apologist would be any better.
(post is archived)