Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] • 7 pts 3y (edited 3y)

"We know they are lying. They know they are lying. They know that we know they are lying. We know that they know that we know they are lying. And still they continue to lie." —Alexander Solzhenitsyn

Stop appealing to some false higher authority of morality, like there is some CivNat unitary standard applied. Whites sat alone at the CivNat table for the last 60 years, while all others regrouped for an attack, and we twiddled our thumbs patting ourselves on the back.

Democracy, and Equality, are false failed gods.

In war, the enemy gets a vote.

No one, in the history of history, has won abiding by the enemies rulebook.

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts 3y (edited 3y)

Appealing to that higher moral authority is what built Western civilization in the first place. It's what builds communities and pushes people to create beautiful works of art, beautiful architecture, solid families. It's what people will fight ferociously until their last dying breath to protect.

National Socialists are myopic and view the entire world through a very narrow 100 year lense. It's like putting your nose up to a painting and trying to construct an image based on a few paint splatters, it's fucking stupid.

You have to stand back and look at the entirety of the painting, the image constructed from the thousands of paint splotches, and then it makes perfect sense.

Like the fact that National Socialists had a love affair with Nietzsche, a philosopher of the enlightenment (which was absolutely Jewish subversion) who worshipped Jews, hated Christianity, and said Germany should expell all of the antisemites and bend the knee to Judaism. This is the voice of National Socialism, they literally copy and pasted large swathes of this faggots philosophy into their mission statement, like his theory of the Ubermensch.

I pointed this out to you in our last conversation and you changed the subject to arguing about word definitions for some fucking reason. Any time I bring up these valid critiques national socialists just dig their heels in and scream "faggot" or do anything else to derail the conversation and avoid the subject matter. It reminds me exactly of Hitler's description of arguing with Jews, and sometimes national socialists will even openly admit they adopt the tactics of the Jews to "fight fire with fire".

Which is even essentially what you're advocating for right now

[–] • 1 pt 3y

mission statement, like his theory of the Ubermensch.

It does not matter who speaks the truth, only that it is the truth.

Anyone that believes otherwise is a fool.

[–] • -1 pt 3y (edited 3y)

Say you are a boomer without saying you are a boomer. You always get so close u/Trash_Panda. I'm beginning to think that you just enjoy well poisoning, Moeshe. Christcucks gonna christcuck. So tell us (((fellow fren))), which jewish rulebook should we be following?

[–] [deleted] • -1 pt 3y (edited 3y)

I'm not a boomer. And Western civilization is built on a tradition of spirited, honest discourse and thoughtful philosophical insight. I.E. the exact opposite of everything you do. But since we're on the topic of "Jewish rulebooks" here are some more excerpts from the philosophy National Socialism is built on, that you never want to address for some bizarre reason

Incidentally, Europe owes the Jews no small thanks for making people think more logically and for establishing cleanlier intellectual habits — nobody more so than the Germans who are a lamentably déraisonnable race who to this day are still in need of having their “heads washed” first. Wherever Jews have won influence they have taught men to make finer distinctions, more rigorous inferences, and to write in a more luminous and cleanly fashion; their task was ever to bring a people “to listen to reason.”

— The Gay Science, §348 (Walter Kaufmann translation, 1974)

Nietzsche then went on to describe the overwhelming Jewish over-representation in all fields including finance, academia, law, medicine and more. He uses this as evidence that they are a superior and strong race, and that the naysayers in Europe (namely Germany) should be expelled

“they want and wish rather…to be absorbed and assimilated by Europe…; and this bent and impulse…should be noted well and accommodated: to that end it might be useful and fair to expel the anti-Semitic screamers from the country.”

Given Nietzsche's avid hatred for Christianity it seems like you certainly are a devoted disciple. You argue like a Jew, you deflect like a Jew, you follow an ideology built on a Jewish worshipping philosopher who's goal was to unite Germany and the Jews against Christianity. You check every single box.

Here's some further reading on Nietzsche and the relationship to Hitler's Germany(marcuse.faculty.history.ucsb.edu) and how this Jew loving self-proclaimed antichrist became the gospel of National Socialism.

He may as well be the Jesus of the Nazi party, which is fucking hilarious.

↓ expand content
[–] [deleted] • 1 pt 3y

The problem is that a lot of normies just believe whatever is shoveled in front of their face. Replacing “white” with “black” is literally the fastest and best way to get through to them.

[–] • 5 pts 3y

Why even bother calling it 'racist.' It rolls off their back and they have excuses piled up such as "black people can't be racist," or "all white people are racist," or "racism only applies to people with power" with a heap of excuses as to why only white people have power. You can't reason them out of this as they don't give a fuck about reason.

Sp stop using their word. It is a slur only used against white people.

**Just call it antiwhite. **

They shit their pants when you call them out for what it is. They know it is true. It immediately makes them the bad guy and puts them on their heals instead of you always trying to fight with them. If you use their word, they are just going to call you "racist."

[–] • 0 pt 3y

Because to be "anti" anything, is an assertion. And victim-hood is in itself never assertive. To be assertive is to challenge victim status.

And their entire power structure relies on the reactionary ability to 1. claim victimhood when criticized, 2. victimize people while hiding behind the shield of number one.

Subvert antifa.

Call yourself antifascist.

Call antifa what it is: antiwhite.

Throw their crimes in the face of the minorities they falsely claim to protect. Preferably in front of antifa and the state, et al.

Counter-agitate.

The truth of who they are comes out in their behavior and results. Even blacks can see it when told.

[–] • 0 pt 3y

If people with power who had light skin where called out as racist the

FUCKING JEW WOULD BE CALLED OUT INSTANTLY

[–] • 0 pt 3y

"old rich white men." became "old white men." became "white men" became "whites."

[–] • 4 pts 3y

Of course it's racist. It was racist from the start. They know it's racist. They don't care.

[–] • 5 pts 3y

They invented the accusation of racism in the soviet union. When they began ethnically replacing various white christian populations, any resistance was considered 'racist'. Racists were murdered by the state.

Pretending like racism means anything but 'white self interest' will do you a disservice. Jews never intended anti-racism campaigns to usher in an era of whites and blacks living in peace. It was always meant to disarm whites, and agitate blacks.

[–] • 1 pt 3y

Create victims and oppressors. Then you can become aggressive against the "oppressors".

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt 3y

I got confused for a second on how they found Cathode Ray Tube displays to be racist lol

[–] • 0 pt 3y

Not enough. Who is it racist against? And who is the creator and sole beneficiary of CRT? Two words. Ten letters combined. Both plural.