I like the history perspective in the last half of that.
I hope I'm coining this as I have not seen it before, but this made me think of the old saying, "What's good for General Motors is good for the country". Now perhaps what is good for Elon is good for the country.
It’s quite possible that had Musk not become actively involved in Trump’s campaign after the first assassination attempt, Trump wouldn’t have won. It’s certain that, had he won, it would have been much closer, not the landslide it turned out to be. And had Musk not bought Twitter earlier, thus disrupting the Democrats’ message-control strategy, Trump’s chances of winning at all would have been much, much lower.
100%
I like the history perspective in the last half of that.
I hope I'm coining this as I have not seen it before, but this made me think of the old saying, "What's good for General Motors is good for the country". Now perhaps what is good for Elon is good for the country.
>It’s quite possible that had Musk not become actively involved in Trump’s campaign after the first assassination attempt, Trump wouldn’t have won. It’s certain that, had he won, it would have been much closer, not the landslide it turned out to be. And had Musk not bought Twitter earlier, thus disrupting the Democrats’ message-control strategy, Trump’s chances of winning at all would have been much, much lower.
100%