In the South Carolina Sovereignty Act (H.3539) the eighth state of the Union is pushing for nullification through Article VI of the Constitution. Nullification is clearer and quicker than the precepts of Article V and Constitutional Convention–which I believe is the one we all learned in school, of course. It takes more time and red tape to pass.
Nullification, on the other hand, is where the states unilaterally refuse to implement unconstitutional laws, a precept generally supported by founding father James Madison. There are exceptions, of course, as even Madison admitted, but South Carolina is putting forth the action that supports Article VI and nullification over Article V and Constitutional Convention, illustrated here:
Hat Tip to for introducing me to The Hayride.
[Source.](https://thehayride.com/2024/02/the-south-carolina-sovereignty-act-and-a-mass-divorce-of-dc/)
>
In the South Carolina Sovereignty Act (H.3539) the eighth state of the Union is pushing for nullification through Article VI of the Constitution. Nullification is clearer and quicker than the precepts of Article V and Constitutional Convention–which I believe is the one we all learned in school, of course. It takes more time and red tape to pass.
>
Nullification, on the other hand, is where the states unilaterally refuse to implement unconstitutional laws, a precept generally supported by founding father James Madison. There are exceptions, of course, as even Madison admitted, but South Carolina is putting forth the action that supports Article VI and nullification over Article V and Constitutional Convention, illustrated here:
>
[Nullification vs. Constitutional Convention.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0bjSXZAl7nM)
Hat Tip to @Oilguy55 for introducing me to The Hayride.
(post is archived)