Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.2K

Ie Socialism / communism programs can ONLY be implemented on a city or at highest county level.

One of my "compromises" was no dollar for a socialism / communism program is allowed to travel more than 5 miles or 30,000 people. Ie in a dense city a dollar for a welfare, retirement, or medical program can only travel 1 mile instead of 5.

People at one end of the state, city, or even country DEFINITELY should not be paying for ANY free stuff for people on the other end of the state, city or country.

If you want the country to operate as it originally was supposed to you're going to have to shrink it dramatically and only allow those who want it to be that way in. And you'll need a system for kicking out those who don't.

My proposal would be a country that has two countries inside it. One FULLY capitalist. The other communist. Sting votes or some other method of weeding out those who want communist / socialist policies to be moved to the communist sub country.

Or possibly at the age of 18 ALL residents of the capitalist country MUST move to the communist country. They must then prove themselves to be readmitted.

Ie Socialism / communism programs can ONLY be implemented on a city or at highest county level. One of my "compromises" was no dollar for a socialism / communism program is allowed to travel more than 5 miles or 30,000 people. Ie in a dense city a dollar for a welfare, retirement, or medical program can only travel 1 mile instead of 5. People at one end of the state, city, or even country DEFINITELY should not be paying for ANY free stuff for people on the other end of the state, city or country. --- If you want the country to operate as it originally was supposed to you're going to have to shrink it dramatically and only allow those who want it to be that way in. And you'll need a system for kicking out those who don't. My proposal would be a country that has two countries inside it. One FULLY capitalist. The other communist. Sting votes or some other method of weeding out those who want communist / socialist policies to be moved to the communist sub country. Or possibly at the age of 18 ALL residents of the capitalist country MUST move to the communist country. They must then prove themselves to be readmitted.

(post is archived)

[–] • 3 pts

Are you suggesting socialism with nationalist tendencies?

[–] • 0 pt

I'm saying way too many people want the government to run shit if not nearly everything and even if you had a country of 100% people who didn't and a system that didn't, a big portion of their kids would want the government running everything. Because it's easy to understand and too many people are fucking dumb.

So the problem of socialism / communism either needs contained, or those who want it need booted out and those who don't brought in.

[–] • 1 pt

My proposal would be a country that has two countries inside it. One FULLY capitalist. The other communist. Sting votes or some other method of weeding out those who want communist / socialist policies to be moved to the communist sub country.

How about a union of individual countries that could control their own politics as they see fit, with a limited federal government to prevent the individual countries from harming each other? People could live in the one that fits them best, or move from one to another as needed.

[–] • 0 pt

The US running as designed would / should work. A free market competition of state policies.

However on the flip side, it didn't. It needs a reboot with some extra supports to make sure the previous failings don't happen again.

[–] • 0 pt

However on the flip side, it didn't. It needs a reboot with some extra supports to make sure the previous failings don't happen again.

I don't see how your suggestion accomplishes that.

[–] • 1 pt

Modern socialism and communism is only appealing as people who like it only do what I call "look up." They look up at people making more money than them, that have more goods, and think socialism and communism will average things out and make them end up with more while the people who have more end up with less.

The always fail to realize that for every one of them looking at someone richer and expects the average to fall between them and the richer, there are 50 far poorer people looking at them thinking the new socialist/communist average will be between the 50 poor and the person who thinks they're moving up with socialism and communism.

You will never see an internet socialist or communist talk about giving up what they have to help people who have less. It's always about those with more giving more to them and everyone else.

[–] • 1 pt

So it'd be like libertarian socialism. Interesting.

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

People want some levels of communism / socialism.

A better option is to expel all communists.

Write in the constitution that tax pressure in relation to GDP is never allowed to exceed 10%. Publicly advocating for higher taxes results in death penalty after three strikes.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

"People". What and Who are these people that want socialism/communism?

[–] • 1 pt

Blah blah blah. Fuck off commy. Just because you can't survive without us don't mean we can't survive without you

[–] • 1 pt

Simple: get rid of the fed and fiat currency. Get asset backed currency. I know it's a simple answer. You have to ask, will the jews approve? And you'll know it's correct.

[–] • 0 pt

In old days Soviets did the opposite and sent political dissidents who didn't like communism to gulags.

[–] • 1 pt

In America America should only exist for Americans. Who believe in the system and that's what they want. It's pretty simple really. In order for America to be America, the ones who don't want it to be have to go.

[–] • 0 pt

A monarchy with a king appointed by God himself is the only government for me. Otherwise anarchy, where I live my life with Jesus Christ the son of God himself as my king.