Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

635

28th Amendment: Repeal 1. All prior amendments to the Constitution of The Untied States of America, save the ratified version of amendments 1-10 known as the Bill Of Rights, are hereby repealed. 2. All federal law, statute, regulation, and guidance based upon dispute, consideration, or adjudication of repealed amendments is hereby voided. 3. This amendment explicitly does not exclude any repealed amendment from being re-proposed pursuant to article V of the Constitution of The United States of America. 3a. Re-Ratification of a repealed amendment will in no circumstance re-institute any federal law, statute, regulation or guidance without proper procedure and oversight. 4. Pursuant to the 10th amendment, this amendment explicitly takes no action in regard to any state law, statute, regulation, or guidance resulting from dispute, consideration, or adjudication of repealed amendments.

29th Amendment: Citizenship 1. A citizen of the United States of America is hereby defined as a person born within the borders of the United States of America, its provinces or territories, to two native born or naturalized citizens of the United States of America. 2. All non citizens residing within the borders of the United States of America, its provinces or territories, without legal abeyance shall be forthwith returned to the their land of heritage or the nearest foreign sovereign locality not sharing more than a single border with the United States of America.

30th Amendment: Voting 1. Each household shall submit a single citizen elector of the age of majority to participate in person in federal elections. 1a. (define a household. If your dad/brother/friend moves in because he got laid off/hurt/whatever does he lose his vote? I don’t quite have the language for this one.) 1b. Each household elector shall present photo identification certified by either state or federal authorities of the state in which the citizen resides. 2. No person holding dual citizenship shall be permitted to submit a vote in a federal election or hold federal office.

31st Amendment: Economy 1. The currency of the United States of America shall be backed, without exception, by physical holdings of precious metals. 1a. A recorded audit of the physical holdings shall be made every five (5) years and such recordings shall be made available to citizens by simple petition. 2. The federal government shall collect no tax, levy, or fee of any kind upon the income, property, or assets of an individual citizen of the United States of America. 3. The federal government shall issue an annual budget report that extends no further than the end of the current term of the current administration.

28th Amendment: Repeal 1. All prior amendments to the Constitution of The Untied States of America, save the ratified version of amendments 1-10 known as the Bill Of Rights, are hereby repealed. 2. All federal law, statute, regulation, and guidance based upon dispute, consideration, or adjudication of repealed amendments is hereby voided. 3. This amendment explicitly does not exclude any repealed amendment from being re-proposed pursuant to article V of the Constitution of The United States of America. 3a. Re-Ratification of a repealed amendment will in no circumstance re-institute any federal law, statute, regulation or guidance without proper procedure and oversight. 4. Pursuant to the 10th amendment, this amendment explicitly takes no action in regard to any state law, statute, regulation, or guidance resulting from dispute, consideration, or adjudication of repealed amendments. 29th Amendment: Citizenship 1. A citizen of the United States of America is hereby defined as a person born within the borders of the United States of America, its provinces or territories, to two native born or naturalized citizens of the United States of America. 2. All non citizens residing within the borders of the United States of America, its provinces or territories, without legal abeyance shall be forthwith returned to ~~the~~ their land of heritage or the nearest ~~foreign~~ sovereign locality not sharing more than a single border with the United States of America. 30th Amendment: Voting 1. Each household shall submit a single citizen elector of the age of majority to participate in person in federal elections. 1a. (define a household. If your dad/brother/friend moves in because he got laid off/hurt/whatever does he lose his vote? I don’t quite have the language for this one.) 1b. Each household elector shall present photo identification certified by ~~either state or federal~~ authorities of the state in which the citizen resides. 2. No person holding dual citizenship shall be permitted to submit a vote in a federal election or hold federal office. 31st Amendment: Economy 1. The currency of the United States of America shall be backed, without exception, by physical holdings of precious metals. 1a. A recorded audit of the physical holdings shall be made every five (5) years and such recordings shall be made available to citizens by simple petition. 2. The federal government shall collect no tax, levy, or fee of any kind upon the income, property, or assets of an individual citizen of the United States of America. 3. The federal government shall issue an annual budget report that extends no further than the end of the current term of the current administration.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (32).
[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Did you read the parenthetical? Say, for example, you dad breaks his hip and has to stay with you for an extended period such that he gets jewed out of his vast estate. Now he lives with you. On your land. Who gives up their vote? You?

You're already cuckiing the US for your cuck-to-jews fetish? There would be no "jewing out of" in a future with a contitutional convention of this variety.

Has to stay with you...

He's a property owner, you're a property owner and you're both male. Nothing changes. Your example doesn't show what you want as... "White, Male property owner" is enough.

There are risks involved with currency management. I want to know what my government is doing and that they're doing it honestly. I would prefer that they only share that information with me and my fellow countrymen.

How is this even remotely relevant? (((currency management))) woudln't be a thing when jews are gone. When (((international trade))) is gone. When borders are secured.

[–] • 1 pt

Did you read the parenthetical? Say, for example, you dad breaks his hip and has to stay with you for an extended period such that he gets jewed out of his vast estate. Now he lives with you. On your land. Who gives up their vote? You?

You're already cuckiing the US for your cuck-to-jews fetish? There would be no "jewing out of" in a future with a contitutional convention of this variety.

Right, because a person who is physically unable to manage there land is going to keep an able bodied man from stepping in. Even a life without jew usury needs income. The hours of the day are finite. Are you going to manage your affairs as well as your fathers/brothers/friends?

He's a property owner, you're a property owner and you're both male. Nothing changes. Your example doesn't show what you want as... "White, Male property owner" is enough.

A "White, Male property owner" is just the guy who got your dad's farm for a good value because he can't work it and he knows that. He's still sharp. He just can't do the work and the farm doesn't bring in enough to pay another hand or two to cover the 16 hours a day he was putting in. He lives with you now. He sold the land. Maybe he sold it to you. He's White, not a land owner but has good control of his mind. Who votes? You? Him?

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Right, because a person who is physically unable to manage there land is going to keep an able bodied man from stepping in. Even a life without jew usury needs income. The hours of the day are finite. Are you going to manage your affairs as well as your fathers/brothers/friends? even life without jew usury needs income

No. Paltry savings will do.

A "White, Male property owner" is just the guy who got your dad's farm for a good value because he can't work it and he knows that. He's still sharp. He just can't do the work and the farm doesn't bring in enough to pay another hand or two to cover the 16 hours a day he was putting in. He lives with you now. He sold the land. Maybe he sold it to you. He's White, not a land owner but has good control of his mind. Who votes? You? Him?

White male land-owner

I don't get why the heck this is so confusing to you. I don't understand why you think corner cases are relevant. I'm done dude. You're nitpicking for some stupid AF reason.

I want the US to be the US. I want voting to be by White, male land-owners. I want the idea of (((democracy))) to be killed. I want banks, bankers and their proponents to be killed. I want international trade to be killed. I want borders to be enforced with deadly force.

You want otherwise while claiming not. e; kek after writing this it dawned on me. You aren't smart enough to figure out why the "land-owner" bit is meaningful and a requirement. That's the point you keep jewing around about. You don't understand why which is funny, sad but funny.

land-owner is a req because it's the smallest meaningfully measurable trait of a (single, 1, one) citizen that the government should care about and would bring about some form of beneficial growth, obvious or not. That guy who owns the land but doesn't work it? His vote matters more than the guy who doesn't own it but works it, so he gets a vote and the other doesn't. To argue otherwise is to agree with predditors who bitch, moan, and cry about landlords and ... PROPERTY OWNERS. They take their frustration out on single house property owners because of their reasonable frustrations on wholly government subsidized, jewish property "owners" because they can't snap out of their (((medicine))) induced NPC life of ideals. You're the same.

[–] • 1 pt

I wasn't jewing around anything. I was exploring a thought about how to determine voting rights. I thought I had presented a cogent theory to you and you went all "dope head commie vaxtard jew" on me. I'll try again.

If you are a land owner and have the right to vote. Then for some reason out of your control you have no choice but to sell your land, putting you in the position of living on the land of another land owning voter, who gives up their vote?

[–] • 1 pt

Oh no, I'm with you. I'm in favor of live fire exercises on the border to denture entry. I know that jewish and wanna be jew banksters have stolen the wealth of this nation and deserve to be hung for it.

What I thought we were talking about here is how to define what a household is as it pertains to the allocation of voting rights particularly in edge cases because I wouldn't want to pen a theory that robbed me or you or your father of their vote.