Make up your fucking mind. You just said "Voting is indeed a right. Without that right..." Now you agree and say it's not a right but a privilege?
You made an argument that made me give further thought and I tried to explain why my mind was changed. Fuck off.
Where I was falling short was in the discrimination. You say White land owners. I wonder about situations like my own. I own my house, not the land it's built on.
So you aren't a property owner but are in some weird agreement from which you need to resolve a parcel of property as yours in whichever method they're agreeable to.
I don't know your situation but last I checked here in the wonderful land of US-rent-to-never-own if you don't front a large amount of money to purchase mineral and water rights for the property you "bought" you're shit out of luck; you don't own that land. Just the privilege of building on it. In a city or town you may not even have the option to make that purchase as the ground under your buildings is reserved for municipal use. My name is on the title to the house but, like everyone else, the city and state own the land.
Your argument is that I vote because I own the house.
No. I've said house a single time many comments ago with reference to predditors outward and vocal frustrations but I made sure to clarify...
Noted. I personally believe that the answer to an HOA is to not move into the neighborhood. At a minimum refuse to sign any covenant.
Why?
Because it's my case and I was thinking about it so took an opportunity to get some input. I thought I might gain some insight from this wonderful place that could help me see better the issue at hand. Your input is clear.
White Property-owning Male
I'm glad you took the time to delve into this with me.
e; My last sentence was retarded. I was taking the piss out of myself on that one.
Because it's my case and I was thinking about it so took an opportunity to get some input. I thought I might gain some insight from this wonderful place that could help me see better the issue at hand. Your input is clear.
Okay. Understood. But as I said... somewhere, your individual case, even if there are many, isn't so substantial the whole should legislate for it. I get it. I do. I'm in a case in which isn't perfect but I do my best. Comparisons to what should be would aggrieve me but I can't take issue with that due to it being entirely hypothetical in nature (what should be). At the end of it: my life is this way because of things that shouldn't be so for me to clamour that I should then get things under the assertion of a different life that should be or could have been is IMO ludicrous.
I get it. I made the choices that brought me to where I am. I own that. I was just checking in to make sure my lens is clear; not too rosy, not too dark. I know that there's no way to account for every circumstance in the rough thought I tossed out. I was aiming for the broadest, least awful, stroke.
(post is archived)