Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

566

28th Amendment: Repeal 1. All prior amendments to the Constitution of The Untied States of America, save the ratified version of amendments 1-10 known as the Bill Of Rights, are hereby repealed. 2. All federal law, statute, regulation, and guidance based upon dispute, consideration, or adjudication of repealed amendments is hereby voided. 3. This amendment explicitly does not exclude any repealed amendment from being re-proposed pursuant to article V of the Constitution of The United States of America. 3a. Re-Ratification of a repealed amendment will in no circumstance re-institute any federal law, statute, regulation or guidance without proper procedure and oversight. 4. Pursuant to the 10th amendment, this amendment explicitly takes no action in regard to any state law, statute, regulation, or guidance resulting from dispute, consideration, or adjudication of repealed amendments.

29th Amendment: Citizenship 1. A citizen of the United States of America is hereby defined as a person born within the borders of the United States of America, its provinces or territories, to two native born or naturalized citizens of the United States of America. 2. All non citizens residing within the borders of the United States of America, its provinces or territories, without legal abeyance shall be forthwith returned to the their land of heritage or the nearest foreign sovereign locality not sharing more than a single border with the United States of America.

30th Amendment: Voting 1. Each household shall submit a single citizen elector of the age of majority to participate in person in federal elections. 1a. (define a household. If your dad/brother/friend moves in because he got laid off/hurt/whatever does he lose his vote? I don’t quite have the language for this one.) 1b. Each household elector shall present photo identification certified by either state or federal authorities of the state in which the citizen resides. 2. No person holding dual citizenship shall be permitted to submit a vote in a federal election or hold federal office.

31st Amendment: Economy 1. The currency of the United States of America shall be backed, without exception, by physical holdings of precious metals. 1a. A recorded audit of the physical holdings shall be made every five (5) years and such recordings shall be made available to citizens by simple petition. 2. The federal government shall collect no tax, levy, or fee of any kind upon the income, property, or assets of an individual citizen of the United States of America. 3. The federal government shall issue an annual budget report that extends no further than the end of the current term of the current administration.

28th Amendment: Repeal 1. All prior amendments to the Constitution of The Untied States of America, save the ratified version of amendments 1-10 known as the Bill Of Rights, are hereby repealed. 2. All federal law, statute, regulation, and guidance based upon dispute, consideration, or adjudication of repealed amendments is hereby voided. 3. This amendment explicitly does not exclude any repealed amendment from being re-proposed pursuant to article V of the Constitution of The United States of America. 3a. Re-Ratification of a repealed amendment will in no circumstance re-institute any federal law, statute, regulation or guidance without proper procedure and oversight. 4. Pursuant to the 10th amendment, this amendment explicitly takes no action in regard to any state law, statute, regulation, or guidance resulting from dispute, consideration, or adjudication of repealed amendments. 29th Amendment: Citizenship 1. A citizen of the United States of America is hereby defined as a person born within the borders of the United States of America, its provinces or territories, to two native born or naturalized citizens of the United States of America. 2. All non citizens residing within the borders of the United States of America, its provinces or territories, without legal abeyance shall be forthwith returned to ~~the~~ their land of heritage or the nearest ~~foreign~~ sovereign locality not sharing more than a single border with the United States of America. 30th Amendment: Voting 1. Each household shall submit a single citizen elector of the age of majority to participate in person in federal elections. 1a. (define a household. If your dad/brother/friend moves in because he got laid off/hurt/whatever does he lose his vote? I don’t quite have the language for this one.) 1b. Each household elector shall present photo identification certified by ~~either state or federal~~ authorities of the state in which the citizen resides. 2. No person holding dual citizenship shall be permitted to submit a vote in a federal election or hold federal office. 31st Amendment: Economy 1. The currency of the United States of America shall be backed, without exception, by physical holdings of precious metals. 1a. A recorded audit of the physical holdings shall be made every five (5) years and such recordings shall be made available to citizens by simple petition. 2. The federal government shall collect no tax, levy, or fee of any kind upon the income, property, or assets of an individual citizen of the United States of America. 3. The federal government shall issue an annual budget report that extends no further than the end of the current term of the current administration.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (32).
[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Right, because a person who is physically unable to manage there land is going to keep an able bodied man from stepping in. Even a life without jew usury needs income. The hours of the day are finite. Are you going to manage your affairs as well as your fathers/brothers/friends? even life without jew usury needs income

No. Paltry savings will do.

A "White, Male property owner" is just the guy who got your dad's farm for a good value because he can't work it and he knows that. He's still sharp. He just can't do the work and the farm doesn't bring in enough to pay another hand or two to cover the 16 hours a day he was putting in. He lives with you now. He sold the land. Maybe he sold it to you. He's White, not a land owner but has good control of his mind. Who votes? You? Him?

White male land-owner

I don't get why the heck this is so confusing to you. I don't understand why you think corner cases are relevant. I'm done dude. You're nitpicking for some stupid AF reason.

I want the US to be the US. I want voting to be by White, male land-owners. I want the idea of (((democracy))) to be killed. I want banks, bankers and their proponents to be killed. I want international trade to be killed. I want borders to be enforced with deadly force.

You want otherwise while claiming not. e; kek after writing this it dawned on me. You aren't smart enough to figure out why the "land-owner" bit is meaningful and a requirement. That's the point you keep jewing around about. You don't understand why which is funny, sad but funny.

land-owner is a req because it's the smallest meaningfully measurable trait of a (single, 1, one) citizen that the government should care about and would bring about some form of beneficial growth, obvious or not. That guy who owns the land but doesn't work it? His vote matters more than the guy who doesn't own it but works it, so he gets a vote and the other doesn't. To argue otherwise is to agree with predditors who bitch, moan, and cry about landlords and ... PROPERTY OWNERS. They take their frustration out on single house property owners because of their reasonable frustrations on wholly government subsidized, jewish property "owners" because they can't snap out of their (((medicine))) induced NPC life of ideals. You're the same.

[–] • 1 pt

I wasn't jewing around anything. I was exploring a thought about how to determine voting rights. I thought I had presented a cogent theory to you and you went all "dope head commie vaxtard jew" on me. I'll try again.

If you are a land owner and have the right to vote. Then for some reason out of your control you have no choice but to sell your land, putting you in the position of living on the land of another land owning voter, who gives up their vote?

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

If you are a land owner and have the right to vote. Then for some reason out of your control you have no choice but to sell your land, putting you in the position of living on the land of another land owning voter, who gives up their vote?

This can't be a real question. You're not longer a land owner. Also voting isn't a right.

e; Also I'm having trouble thinking of a situation that would lead to someone NEEDING to sell their land. Wouldn't happen. Medical bills don't exist. In a White society that has high trust, high morals, zero violence, excellent health etc. Socialized healthcare is a thing as is socialized "insurance" for property etc. (due to natural disasters, ALA what FEMA should be)

ee; Also my apologies I suppose you might reply in the seconds before I edit to where 1) you don't see my edit and 2) I don't see your reply which causes confusion. I don't multipreply, I edit to keep a smoother conversational flow going rather than branching off.

[–] • 1 pt

To your edits: I am to blame. I don't post or engage often. I'm the slow kid.

The wonderful world in your head is almost as strange and magical as the one in mine.

Voting is indeed a right. Without that right we are left with the "Devine Right Of Kings" and the like. The right to vote, like all other rights, are not granted by the government but should be protected by it. To vote for representation is a needful thing in a large population. No democracy, fuck that. That's just mob rule. But I think that well managed representative republicanism might have a chance. The same way that capitalism might have a chance if we could get the crony-ism out of either of them.

I think I get where your coming from though. You want a test. I want a test. Yours is land ownership. Now that you've made me thing of it... I want basic cognizance. Not some psychyo-schistoso shit. Just the basics: identify a man, identify a woman, are there any other choices, can one become the other, is there any use in joining same to same. That's all. A wrong answer shuts it down.

You may say that "A wrong answer" is open to interpretation and may not turn out the way I think. I would say the same thing to land ownership. Just look at where we are. The answer is the same either way. When the time comes it will get very uncomfortable for people on the unpopular side of the scale.

[–] • 1 pt

Oh no, I'm with you. I'm in favor of live fire exercises on the border to denture entry. I know that jewish and wanna be jew banksters have stolen the wealth of this nation and deserve to be hung for it.

What I thought we were talking about here is how to define what a household is as it pertains to the allocation of voting rights particularly in edge cases because I wouldn't want to pen a theory that robbed me or you or your father of their vote.

[–] • 0 pt

What I thought we were talking about here is how to define what a household is as it pertains to the allocation of voting rights particularly in edge cases because I wouldn't want to pen a theory that robbed me or you or your father of their vote.

Okay. So you're going to strawman and move the goalposts on what I wrote in my comment while ignoring the meaning. Awesome. That is what we were talking about. And it still was until you walked it back and just fucked about.

allocation of voting rights

White Male Land owner

IT IS NOT COMPLICATED. Each of your corner cases expressly requires jews to be in power still. Why would I want to solve for such a corner case? Why?