Repeal the 19th, then we'll see about the rest
Repeal the 19th, then we'll see about the rest
I agree. See step one.
I agree. See step one.
30
No. Retarded and cucked. Male, Citizen property-owners. Done.
1a. A recorded audit of the physical holdings shall be made every five (5) years and such recordings shall be made available to citizens by simple petition.
No. Retarded. Just make it freely available at a constant rate.
1b. Each household elector shall present photo identification certified by either state or federal authorities.
No. Retarded. Keep the federal government out of all elections.
- No person holding dual citizenship shall be permitted to submit a vote in a federal election or hold federal office.
No. Retarded. No person holding dual citizenship is allowed in the country and no individual who is not a White, ethnically and racially European shall be allowed in either.
Turn off (((international trade))) completely.
>30
No. Retarded and cucked.
Male, Citizen property-owners.
Done.
>1a. A recorded audit of the physical holdings shall be made every five (5) years and such recordings shall be made available to citizens by simple petition.
No. Retarded.
Just make it freely available at a constant rate.
>1b. Each household elector shall present photo identification certified by either state or federal authorities.
No. Retarded.
Keep the federal government out of all elections.
>2. No person holding dual citizenship shall be permitted to submit a vote in a federal election or hold federal office.
No. Retarded.
No person holding dual citizenship is allowed in the country and no individual who is not a White, ethnically and racially European shall be allowed in either.
----
Turn off (((international trade))) completely.
I was hopping for something a bit more constructive from you, but I'll work with what I've been given.
Male, Citizen property-owners. Done.
Did you read the parenthetical? Say, for example, you dad breaks his hip and has to stay with you for an extended period such that he gets jewed out of his vast estate. Now he lives with you. On your land. Who gives up their vote? You?
1a. A recorded audit of the physical holdings shall be made every five (5) years and such recordings shall be made available to citizens by simple petition.
No. Retarded. Just make it freely available at a constant rate.
There are risks involved with currency management. I want to know what my government is doing and that they're doing it honestly. I would prefer that they only share that information with me and my fellow countrymen.
1b. Each household elector shall present photo identification certified by either state or federal authorities.
No. Retarded. Keep the federal government out of all elections.
Ok. Strike the federal identification. No passports and such. State issued only. My state senator is more likely to know me personally anyway.
I missed the "expand"
No person holding dual citizenship shall be permitted to submit a vote in a federal election or hold federal office.
No. Retarded. No person holding dual citizenship is allowed in the country and no individual who is not a White, ethnically and racially European shall be allowed in either.
Turn off (((international trade))) completely.
I get the hesitancy to embrace the whole "All men are created equal" part. I've seen niggers beat people for no reason. I've know second hand taco niggers wet back across the border to sell dugs and make a few dollars more doing shit work they wouldn't be willing to do to make their home a better place. jews and other sand niggers just seem to want to make a fuss so Whites want to kill them when we'd leave them alone if they'd just fuck off and kill each other on their own time in their own space. At least the street shitters are willing to stay home and just ring my phone to scam me. I can ignore that. The point to me is (some call it the weakness of Whites) if you can keep your shit in check I'm willing to give you a chance. Fuck around and you will find out.
I was hopping for something a bit more constructive from you, but I'll work with what I've been given.
>Male, Citizen property-owners.
Done.
Did you read the parenthetical? Say, for example, you dad breaks his hip and has to stay with you for an extended period such that he gets jewed out of his vast estate. Now he lives with you. On your land. Who gives up their vote? You?
>1a. A recorded audit of the physical holdings shall be made every five (5) years and such recordings shall be made available to citizens by simple petition.
>>No. Retarded.
Just make it freely available at a constant rate.
There are risks involved with currency management. I want to know what my government is doing and that they're doing it honestly. I would prefer that they only share that information with me and my fellow countrymen.
>1b. Each household elector shall present photo identification certified by either state or federal authorities.
>>No. Retarded.
Keep the federal government out of all elections.
Ok. Strike the federal identification. No passports and such. State issued only. My state senator is more likely to know me personally anyway.
---
I missed the "expand"
>No person holding dual citizenship shall be permitted to submit a vote in a federal election or hold federal office.
>>No. Retarded.
No person holding dual citizenship is allowed in the country and no individual who is not a White, ethnically and racially European shall be allowed in either.
>>
Turn off (((international trade))) completely.
I get the hesitancy to embrace the whole "All men are created equal" part. I've seen niggers beat people for no reason. I've know second hand taco niggers wet back across the border to sell dugs and make a few dollars more doing shit work they wouldn't be willing to do to make their home a better place. jews and other sand niggers just seem to want to make a fuss so Whites want to kill them when we'd leave them alone if they'd just fuck off and kill each other on their own time in their own space. At least the street shitters are willing to stay home and just ring my phone to scam me. I can ignore that. The point to me is (some call it the weakness of Whites) if you can keep your shit in check I'm willing to give you a chance. Fuck around and you will find out.
Did you read the parenthetical? Say, for example, you dad breaks his hip and has to stay with you for an extended period such that he gets jewed out of his vast estate. Now he lives with you. On your land. Who gives up their vote? You?
You're already cuckiing the US for your cuck-to-jews fetish? There would be no "jewing out of" in a future with a contitutional convention of this variety.
Has to stay with you...
He's a property owner, you're a property owner and you're both male. Nothing changes. Your example doesn't show what you want as... "White, Male property owner" is enough.
There are risks involved with currency management. I want to know what my government is doing and that they're doing it honestly. I would prefer that they only share that information with me and my fellow countrymen.
How is this even remotely relevant? (((currency management))) woudln't be a thing when jews are gone. When (((international trade))) is gone. When borders are secured.
> Did you read the parenthetical? Say, for example, you dad breaks his hip and has to stay with you for an extended period such that he gets jewed out of his vast estate. Now he lives with you. On your land. Who gives up their vote? You?
You're already cuckiing the US for your cuck-to-jews fetish?
There would be no "jewing out of" in a future with a contitutional convention of this variety.
>Has to stay with you...
He's a property owner, you're a property owner and you're both male. Nothing changes. Your example doesn't show what you want as... "White, Male property owner" is enough.
>There are risks involved with currency management. I want to know what my government is doing and that they're doing it honestly. I would prefer that they only share that information with me and my fellow countrymen.
How is this even remotely relevant? (((currency management))) woudln't be a thing when jews are gone. When (((international trade))) is gone. When borders are secured.
Did you read the parenthetical? Say, for example, you dad breaks his hip and has to stay with you for an extended period such that he gets jewed out of his vast estate. Now he lives with you. On your land. Who gives up their vote? You?
You're already cuckiing the US for your cuck-to-jews fetish? There would be no "jewing out of" in a future with a contitutional convention of this variety.
Right, because a person who is physically unable to manage there land is going to keep an able bodied man from stepping in. Even a life without jew usury needs income. The hours of the day are finite. Are you going to manage your affairs as well as your fathers/brothers/friends?
He's a property owner, you're a property owner and you're both male. Nothing changes. Your example doesn't show what you want as... "White, Male property owner" is enough.
A "White, Male property owner" is just the guy who got your dad's farm for a good value because he can't work it and he knows that. He's still sharp. He just can't do the work and the farm doesn't bring in enough to pay another hand or two to cover the 16 hours a day he was putting in. He lives with you now. He sold the land. Maybe he sold it to you. He's White, not a land owner but has good control of his mind. Who votes? You? Him?
>Did you read the parenthetical? Say, for example, you dad breaks his hip and has to stay with you for an extended period such that he gets jewed out of his vast estate. Now he lives with you. On your land. Who gives up their vote? You?
>>
You're already cuckiing the US for your cuck-to-jews fetish?
There would be no "jewing out of" in a future with a contitutional convention of this variety.
Right, because a person who is physically unable to manage there land is going to keep an able bodied man from stepping in. Even a life without jew usury needs income. The hours of the day are finite. Are you going to manage your affairs as well as your fathers/brothers/friends?
>He's a property owner, you're a property owner and you're both male. Nothing changes. Your example doesn't show what you want as... "White, Male property owner" is enough.
A "White, Male property owner" is just the guy who got your dad's farm for a good value because he can't work it and he knows that. He's still sharp. He just can't do the work and the farm doesn't bring in enough to pay another hand or two to cover the 16 hours a day he was putting in. He lives with you now. He sold the land. Maybe he sold it to you. He's White, not a land owner but has good control of his mind. Who votes? You? Him?
29.1&2 "borders" 29.3. Children born overseas to a parent serving in the US military should be considered a citizen. (I'm not sure if it would do more harm than good to stipulate they must be enrolled in an "American" school, or return to American soil before the age of 5(?).)
re: 31.2: With what method would the federal government be funded?
29.1&2 "borders"
29.3. Children born overseas to a parent serving in the US military should be considered a citizen. (I'm not sure if it would do more harm than good to stipulate they must be enrolled in an "American" school, or return to American soil before the age of 5(?).)
re: 31.2: With what method would the federal government be funded?
Birth citizenship shall be granted to individuals whose parents are both legal American citizens at the time of birth.
Birth citizenship shall be granted to individuals whose parents are both legal American citizens at the time of birth.
Thanks for the spell check. I miss things from time to time (all the time really).
Children born in the military are usually delivered on base. Those bases are sovereign US territory. In unusual cases exceptions/waivers/legalese can be made. As for schooling, I don't think it should be addressed in the constitution. Parents raise their children not the government.
re: 31.2: With what method would the federal government be funded?
Prior to the institution of the federal income tax the government was funded by trade taxes (import/export fees and such). In my opinion it's a good way to keep the federal government pinching pennies (not overreaching) and keep our business our own.
Thanks for the spell check. I miss things from time to time (all the time really).
Children born in the military are usually delivered on base. Those bases are sovereign US territory. In unusual cases exceptions/waivers/legalese can be made. As for schooling, I don't think it should be addressed in the constitution. Parents raise their children not the government.
>re: 31.2: With what method would the federal government be funded?
Prior to the institution of the federal income tax the government was funded by trade taxes (import/export fees and such). In my opinion it's a good way to keep the federal government pinching pennies (not overreaching) and keep our business our own.
Fuck the constitution. Wake the fuck up and stop acting like a slave. The faggots that drafted and signed that "piece of paper" were nobodies heroes.
Fuck the constitution. Wake the fuck up and stop acting like a slave. The faggots that drafted and signed that "piece of paper" were nobodies heroes.
https://youtu.be/ngpsJKQR_ZE
I don't think of them as heroes. They did lay out some good ideas. If you want to take my shit you'll find a way; the system of law is relevant to the criminal only in so much as how to circumvent it. The "piece of paper" is only worth the market value however, the ideas for framing a government that were put forth over several years and coalesced into the resulting documents were worth a couple centuries of debate about what good governance really is. It's been worth my time anyway.
I don't think of them as heroes. They did lay out some good ideas. If you want to take my shit you'll find a way; the system of law is relevant to the criminal only in so much as how to circumvent it. The "piece of paper" is only worth the market value however, the ideas for framing a government that were put forth over several years and coalesced into the resulting documents were worth a couple centuries of debate about what good governance really is. It's been worth my time anyway.
It was theft from the beginning. Having to pay to be governed... What a fucking stupid idea. Unless your the "governing body."
The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.
Who gave them the right? The paper? The pens? The signatures? Because it damn sure wasn't any of us. Where did they get the authority to make such a document? God?
And that's just one small bit of a document full of text that says some people have more rights than the other 99+% of us.
It was theft from the beginning. Having to pay to be governed... What a fucking stupid idea. Unless your the "governing body."
> The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.
Who gave them the right? The paper? The pens? The signatures? Because it damn sure wasn't any of us. Where did they get the authority to make such a document? God?
And that's just one small bit of a document full of text that says some people have more rights than the other 99+% of us.
You make a solid point. War isn't free. Only a small portion of the population even wanted to separate from England at the time. There were debts to be paid. The people who wanted to separate, admittedly a small percentage of those who fought and died, wrote rules to accommodate the repayment of those debts. They also wrote in rules that allow us to change those rules and (I know I'm reaching a bit here) reign in the government they set up. It's not a farce, it's not a lie. A minority put us on this path, many a blue hand has pushed us in to bad decisions and "no good option" positions. Still, if you read the documents, as you clearly have, there is a way forward. It may not be as peaceful as some would like, but there is a way forward without abandoning the fundamental Natural Law Theory that was presented at the start of this country.
You make a solid point. War isn't free. Only a small portion of the population even wanted to separate from England at the time. There were debts to be paid. The people who wanted to separate, admittedly a small percentage of those who fought and died, wrote rules to accommodate the repayment of those debts. They also wrote in rules that allow us to change those rules and (I know I'm reaching a bit here) reign in the government they set up. It's not a farce, it's not a lie. A minority put us on this path, many a blue hand has pushed us in to bad decisions and "no good option" positions. Still, if you read the documents, as you clearly have, there is a way forward. It may not be as peaceful as some would like, but there is a way forward without abandoning the fundamental Natural Law Theory that was presented at the start of this country.
If you don't pay taxes, then it's only fair to bar you from using infrastructures built with taxes, no?
If you don't pay taxes, then it's only fair to bar you from using infrastructures built with taxes, no?
You are beyond small minded. Go fuck off and ban me from more of your subs. Fucking mouth breather.
You are beyond small minded. Go fuck off and ban me from more of your subs. Fucking mouth breather.
Oh, I see... You tried to fuck with me once, and since then you live with a giant pain in the ass...
I certainly told you it wasn't a good idea to fuck with me, but you didn't listen... And now that's the result, you're butthurt beyond repair...
Oh, I see... You tried to fuck with me once, and since then you live with a giant pain in the ass...
I certainly told you it wasn't a good idea to fuck with me, but you didn't listen... And now that's the result, you're butthurt beyond repair...
That video is low-IQ and jewish as fuck.
That video is low-IQ and jewish as fuck.
You're low IQ. You're brainwashed into thinking some people have more rights than you. The video is simple so retards can understand it.
You're low IQ. You're brainwashed into thinking some people have more rights than you. The video is simple so retards can understand it.
(post is archived)