Like the private decision to take Ivermectin from your doc? They sure didnt seem to give a fuck then.
^ this
(((they))) move the goal posts more often than a kid misplaces toys and objects.
Like the private decision to take Ivermectin from your doc? They sure didnt seem to give a fuck then.
^ this
(((they))) move the goal posts more often than a kid misplaces toys and objects.
who still thinks the US govt is legit? dumb enough to send them money or child-soldiers? I cant believe how many Americans continue to tune in to their enemies propaganda channels
But I think this is clearing decks to legalise otherwise illegal surveillance
I think that ship sailed a long time ago. Doctors have been compelled to gather and report all kinds of non-medical information for years. Just like banks and apps like Venmo, they will bend to the will of the Fed out of fear for their livelihoods.
LOOK AT ALL THE GLOWNIGGERS!
"I know this is an unpopular opinion"
Lol.
I think this and the gun ruling this week is designed to get the demonrats base to mobilise for mid terms
I see what you're getting at but I disagree that it's about privacy.
You bring up a valid point but one that is going to be shrouded, or better be, per state. If someone is already on medicare/medicad, then they have already relinquished their privacy to the fed/state. Even going to a provider that accepts them, even if you don't use, is extremely questionable. There are no if, ands or buts about it. If you want full privacy between you and a doctor then look towards those that will not accept.
The amount of people that watched 2000 mules and didn't stop to question the dragnet of data obtained for are just as bad.
(post is archived)