Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

1.1K

Higgledy Piggledy
Vegancuck @Aragorn
Substitutes meat with more
Fiber-filled fare.

All of that alters his
Microbiology,
Making him reason and
Shit like a hare.

PS: I noticed a fairly good counter to your NAP argument that went unanswered. Did you not see it?

It seems you yourself acknowledged a trait that separates humans and animals. Namely that humans comprehend morality while animals don't. This would answer the absurd hypotheticals you brought up yesterday (What if Yoda were real? What if blacks and asians were different species?) while neatly supplying a reason the NAP should not apply to non-humans. If something is not capable of moral judgement, then they are incapable of honoring the NAP through moral determination, therefore there is no reason for us to apply to NAP to them.

Higgledy Piggledy Vegancuck @Aragorn Substitutes meat with more Fiber-filled fare. All of that alters his Microbiology, Making him reason and Shit like a hare. PS: I noticed a fairly good counter to your NAP argument that went unanswered. [Did you not see it?](https://poal.co/s/DebateAVegan/13268/817c70df-1901-4a54-a2d9-6026fa08e7ea) It seems you yourself acknowledged a trait that separates humans and animals. Namely that humans comprehend morality while animals don't. This would answer the absurd hypotheticals you brought up yesterday (What if Yoda were real? What if blacks and asians were different species?) while neatly supplying a reason the NAP should not apply to non-humans. If something is not capable of moral judgement, then they are incapable of honoring the NAP through moral determination, therefore there is no reason for us to apply to NAP to them.

(post is archived)