Interesting thought. Quick thought experiment:
Alice upvotes Barry. Alice deletes her account.
What does Barry's account say for the upvotes? Does it say "Received 1 upvotes from [Deleted]"? In this case, if Charlie, Danni, and Edgar all do the same as Alice would it then say "Received 4 upvotes from [Deleted]"?
Would these upvotes go away entirely? Would there no longer be a record of voting from that person in the entire database?
It strikes me as something interesting- a public ledger for all decisions made. I remember an argument being made for using a blockchain to do this very same thing.
I can see the benefits- if an Alt is just used to bump a few accounts, it would be easy to identify based on the ledger. However, a person could be browbeaten for their voting practices as well- having a person's voting record used as a weapon against them may reduce the amount of votes from timid/paranoid/cautious users. That would be doubly concerning if an account is dox'd.
I'll need to spend some time contemplating this.
That thought experiment is interesting. Both end results could be abused.
As for the rest, I err on the side of anonymity. Just because of all the people looking to get others fired/arrested for what they say on the internet.
Also, fuck. I remember a time when what you said publicly was not on record forever. I just don't want Poal to turn into a place where you're having a conversation and then some dick comes in and says, "Ya, well, you upvoted this post, so that must mean you actually think this, you such and such."
When an account is deleted or banned it’s status changes in the database, but comments and posts remain.
That’s a “Throat” core design.
That way a user that wants their account back (unbanned or restored from deletion) can easily turned back to active by changing a value in the database.
(post is archived)