He seems to think that if voat, poal, and phucks all get together to make a meta-site, it will be a mighty empire of dumbshits, and he will be an early member. Also this throat place he seems to be talking about. Then he will revel in his power and prestige, and others will post only at his leisure, and he will be completely in charge of all white supremacy and antisemitism. Not to mention criticism of established government.
Also, then every quip ever typed by anyone outside of reddit can be used in federal hate-speech litigation without the need to spend so much time researching identities. Oh, look! Federal, federation ... hm.
Voat and Poal definitely won't be coming together anytime soon, Voat is centralized and has their own agenda to profit just like Reddit. The Poal devs have already made use of federated tech through PeerTube and possibly Mastodon in the future. Here's my explanation of what I meant by federated https://poal.co/s/Poaldev/63353/6652c3a4-a085-472a-9d9c-5989d7c65264
If the Poal wants to be a true platform for freedom of speech, decentralization seems like the best way forward. By federating, no one would have control over the content of the website, as anyone could selfhost their own instance and submit their content to Poal if that's what the devs wanted.
My issue with the decentralization thing(and I'm not against it) is that if no one has control over platform at all then no one can stop people from implementing censorship.
I helped someone setup a throat instance just a few days ago, anyone can setup one up. Poal.co isn't exactly throat anymore but its still based on it.
Federating would be decentralizing by allowing other instances to post on your website and vice versa. The instance owner can do whatever they like to their platform, they could make their website independent from other instances or simply only let a select few to submit to your website. If one of the instances decide to censor their platform then the user can either change instances or even make their own with different rules. I'm not sure how you could censor all the instances, I don't think that would be possible unless you forced every instance to follow your own set of rules.
(post is archived)