WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

193

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

How cute. Anyone who dissents from the narrative is locked down. Absolutely pathetic. Remove voting entirely, then. It either does something or it’s restricted to only votes the administration wants.

[–] 1 pt

it’s restricted to only votes the administration wants.

It’s this part, it seems. You’re not supposed to downvote something because it’s a lie or you don’t like it, unless you have been around awhile and scored lots of points. Then you can see who downvotes, later see who upvotes and who downvotes (I believe, not there yet, maybe never will.)

[–] 1 pt

You’re not supposed to downvote something because it’s a lie

What a fucking useless website, then.

unless you have been around awhile and scored lots of points. Then you can see

Holy shit, what a fucking self-reciprocating nightmare.

EDIT: lol, I can’t even upvote your post now.

REMOVE. VOTING.

It does fucking nothing, doesn’t even work, and is restricted only to the butt buddies of the administration.

[–] 0 pt

Oh it gets even better. Quoth AOU ximself:

"If you keep downvoting regardless if it's spam or not, your votes will eventually get cancelled.

We already have a report spam button for red barons (level30+) and they are doing a great job at helping reporting real spam."

You can't report spam until you get to a high enough "level." And you can't downvote too much spam either, because even downvoting nothing BUT spam will STILL get your votes cancelled.

Question this faggotry and all you get is a pithy little "Well I could remove the restriction and just direct all the fake reports to YOUR inbox."

[–] -1 pt

Might be interesting if the only was to browse is by “New”? Otherwise how could items rise to the top, like the dumb QStorm post about Kevin Seefried by @qgod214?