WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

641

Here is @AOU identifying the latest hystereichal alt: https://poal.co/s/Introductions/699379/8b8796eb-85d0-4a0e-9bf5-137bc3c1c83f#cmnts

Personally I think it’s necessary, but I could see how this could create issues down the line.

Who decides which users are acting in bad faith? If IDing alts is fair game, then what else?

IMO it’s easily justifiable when the user in question is hystereichal. I’ve been calling out his alts on sight and it’s been fun watching him seethe every time his game is uncovered. But is an admin doing it an unfair advantage?

What do you all think?

Here is @AOU identifying the latest hystereichal alt: https://poal.co/s/Introductions/699379/8b8796eb-85d0-4a0e-9bf5-137bc3c1c83f#cmnts Personally I think it’s necessary, but I could see how this could create issues down the line. Who decides which users are acting in bad faith? If IDing alts is fair game, then what else? IMO it’s easily justifiable when the user in question is hystereichal. I’ve been calling out his alts on sight and it’s been fun watching him seethe every time his game is uncovered. But is an admin doing it an unfair advantage? What do you all think?

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

He who pays the bills sets the rules. We users have no say in what the admin can or cannot do. We don't pay the bills. Simple as.

Users who don't like that the admin is essentially god here have no obligation to stick around. No one owes you anything if you're not paying the bills. Simple as.

Everyone got it now? Simple as.