Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

602

Here is @AOU identifying the latest hystereichal alt: https://poal.co/s/Introductions/699379/8b8796eb-85d0-4a0e-9bf5-137bc3c1c83f#cmnts

Personally I think it’s necessary, but I could see how this could create issues down the line.

Who decides which users are acting in bad faith? If IDing alts is fair game, then what else?

IMO it’s easily justifiable when the user in question is hystereichal. I’ve been calling out his alts on sight and it’s been fun watching him seethe every time his game is uncovered. But is an admin doing it an unfair advantage?

What do you all think?

Here is @AOU identifying the latest hystereichal alt: https://poal.co/s/Introductions/699379/8b8796eb-85d0-4a0e-9bf5-137bc3c1c83f#cmnts Personally I think it’s necessary, but I could see how this could create issues down the line. Who decides which users are acting in bad faith? If IDing alts is fair game, then what else? IMO it’s easily justifiable when the user in question is hystereichal. I’ve been calling out his alts on sight and it’s been fun watching him seethe every time his game is uncovered. But is an admin doing it an unfair advantage? What do you all think?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (23).
[–] [Sticky] • 1 pt

Here is @AOU identifying the latest hystereichal alt

Nope. Nowhere in my comment I make a reference to that account.

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

That at least gives you some plausible deniability. I’ll grant you that.

It’s not your fault some of us can read between the lines.

[–] • 1 pt

lol And it’s not your fault you can't read server logs.

[–] • 1 pt

Right. You technically haven’t revealed anything. 😉