WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

476

Here is @AOU identifying the latest hystereichal alt: https://poal.co/s/Introductions/699379/8b8796eb-85d0-4a0e-9bf5-137bc3c1c83f#cmnts

Personally I think it’s necessary, but I could see how this could create issues down the line.

Who decides which users are acting in bad faith? If IDing alts is fair game, then what else?

IMO it’s easily justifiable when the user in question is hystereichal. I’ve been calling out his alts on sight and it’s been fun watching him seethe every time his game is uncovered. But is an admin doing it an unfair advantage?

What do you all think?

Here is @AOU identifying the latest hystereichal alt: https://poal.co/s/Introductions/699379/8b8796eb-85d0-4a0e-9bf5-137bc3c1c83f#cmnts Personally I think it’s necessary, but I could see how this could create issues down the line. Who decides which users are acting in bad faith? If IDing alts is fair game, then what else? IMO it’s easily justifiable when the user in question is hystereichal. I’ve been calling out his alts on sight and it’s been fun watching him seethe every time his game is uncovered. But is an admin doing it an unfair advantage? What do you all think?

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts (edited )

The Talmud tells us Admins are allowed to identify the users as though they were branding cattle, for that is what they are before the eyes of YHWH.