WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

603

(post is archived)

[–] 4 pts

depends

the smart ones

or

the super, ultra, gigantic rich ?

[–] 7 pts

The smart ones.

[–] 4 pts

Ironically, if it were the (((top 1% ruling class))) to disappear the world would become damn near utopia.

[–] 2 pts

Oy Vey! That’s antisemitic!

[–] 1 pt

The top 1% of anything, whether it be money or intellect, does not perform more work than the lower 99%. Society would still continue to operate because the top 1% aren't calling all the workers with what to do every morning - people will keep going to work as usual, your water & electricity will still flow. Now science & tech related jobs would see both a talent decrease and funding would dry up... but even then, lower level outfits will still continue to operate as usual.

[–] 0 pt

I don't agree. Modern civilization is the result of generations of building on the available knowledge. Every science has been a slow progression of adding on to the research of others. The top 1% of smartest people usually know a significant amount about a very narrow subject. If we lost them, there would be a temporary slowdown in the progress of science until the younger ones caught up and refilled those positions. The actual threat is the dragging down of western society by third world muslim immigration.

[–] 0 pt

The actual threat is the dragging down of western society by third world muslim immigration.

How jewy of you to blame the consequence but not the cause.

[–] 0 pt

I was referring to smartest people, not richest people. The richest are jews. The smartest are not.

[–] 0 pt

The sewer rats aren’t the richest. They only own virtual debts.