If they invent new battery technology that's as energy dense as jet fuel, and is safe, I would consider it after it has a ten year safety record similar or better than jet fuel planes. I would want to see how it does in electrical storms, hurricanes, all of that.
Darwin Airlines - We'll get you down under.
Not even maybe.
Every person that Is buying an EV IS that dumb. They are Burning up for no reason and they will not go the 'advertised' distance so they are stranded and a replacement battery is around $33,000 and you can Wait two years to get it. The criminal Lie of EV is in the top ten lies in history.
A blimp?
I would fly one. Your power isn't actually particularly important, let alone necessaary, to fly safely to a landing. Planes already face the same challenge most EV drivers do - no refill midtrip. So they could figure some of that out. So similsr to @Bankster_Command convludions and I might. There's lots of reasons why ekectric isn't the greatest financial decission, but that's different than safety.
But they never will, not on a large scale, because all the major plane manufacturers are jew controlled or owned military industrials. They'll be happy to make you have a bad investment to have more dependence on a grid. But that's for you, not for jew.
Compare how long it would take to recharge batteries compared to fill up a plane with kerosene.
(post is archived)