Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

630

you people are just as bad as Zuck and the main stream media. Censoring what people can see. If you are trying to run people off. It’s working. I only came here because Voat was destroyed. The people there were cool. Here I see just a bunch of school yard bully’s. I will not be back here. So you have successfully chased me off. Happy now. Good riddance

you people are just as bad as Zuck and the main stream media. Censoring what people can see. If you are trying to run people off. It’s working. I only came here because Voat was destroyed. The people there were cool. Here I see just a bunch of school yard bully’s. I will not be back here. So you have successfully chased me off. Happy now. Good riddance

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (16).
[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

not that youre wrong about any of that, but in the rules, it says that while Poal is a frees-peech platform, a subpoal does not need to be, at risk of losing face. Technically, any subpoal can have any set of rules, and you are subject to their Dictatorship. You can start a similar subpoal of your own and be a hands off moderator with Poal rules.

as long as a person is not a pedo defending faggot, or a pedo, and as long as you dont threaten to kill someone or tell someone to kill themselves, you should be able to post anything.

[–] • 1 pt

Yea, analclutch banned me from /Jews for using the slur 'joo'. Pathetic kids stuff.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

lol, that sucks, but is also kinda funny tbh. if you think about it, you lost a jew, so nothing of value was lost

[–] • 1 pt

Lol, tis true. sliver lining and all that ..

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

Thanks for that, appreciate it. Yeah it wasn't anything radical that I said, in the least, I was surprised.

> it says that while Poal is a free-speech platform, a subpoal does not need to be, at risk of losing face.

Yes, totally agree with that.