I think we are at a point, and some smart person out there should coin the term and make it mainstream, but at the point where technology that we do have is completely in the realm of conspiratorial mindsets and no normie would ever be able to comprehend it.
We have space based DEW satellites that can pinpoint individual sheds in the back yard of a random house out in the middle of nowhere and destroy it. How do you protect yourself from that? What does a government entity do to protect its citizens? How does the news portray this or explain these things? And then finally, how does the normie overcome their cognitive dissonance that we really can modify weather and shoot space lasers at people?
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
~Arthur C Clarke
Any sufficiently poor magic is indistinguishable from technology.
>How do you protect yourself from that?
You either live underground or become the guy operating the DEW
Kala engineer everything https://www.tiktok.com/@engineer.everything/
Not much on her jewtube https://m.youtube.com/@engineerkala/videos
Wow. Impressive. Probably a good idea if you have a little land. Make underground bunker for those tricky wild fires.
We have space based DEW satellites that can pinpoint individual sheds in the back yard of a random house out in the middle of nowhere and destroy it.
Assuming this were a true statement, once a fire starts on that structure, the fire will do what fire does and it can spread and burn other structures. DEWs would be used to start the fire but they would not be used continuously until the structure is gone. How do you explain how the fire that gets started behaves differently from any other fire as people are claiming? How would this result be different if the fire were started with gasoline and matches?
No one seems to be any kind of fire expert and those who are have not been saying anything whether or not these are unusual fire after-effects. By contrast, everyone seems to be an expert on DEWs though not a single person has actual firsthand knowledge of such things. It's all still conspiracy theory when all you have to work with is conjecture. How do you so positively know this was started by a DEW?
It's amazing that the wildfire skipped blue umbrellas and cars...
It's amazing that the wildfire skipped blue umbrellas and cars...
I guess you haven't seen the 4K drone footage of the fire area. I watched it and specifically looked for blue items in the burned areas and did not see any blue items in it. The pictures claiming to have blue items left unscathed have no sources that I can find to prove they are from Lahaina or even from any specific date. I suspect they are someone's curated collection of unrelated images brought together to suggest that blue items were left unaffected as proof of a DEW.
The additional proof of blue paper not burning with a laser makes a lot of assumptions because it claims the laser is infrared, the power of the laser output is unknown and their is a complete lack of understanding of how materials are affected by laser light. It's not proof of shit in my opinion because I have a lot of laser knowledge and practical experience beyond mere laser pointers. People ignorant of how lasers work will believe such things without question because they don't know how to question it properly. It's bullshit to compare that result with any kind of laser that could be used as a DEW, but they don't know that.
I don't really have an answer, and I am pretty sure you know this. My assumption comes from observable images that seem to show segments of area that have been absolutely incinerated with surrounding areas seemingly untouched. Are you claiming there is no foul play? Nothing to question here? It's a 'normal' fire and 'normal' fire behavior? Or are you the fire demolition expert that hasn't chimed in to explain to us retards how we're stupid for thinking that things exist that could produce these results and subsequently be used against us?
To come out and denigrate others for not being an expert, please provide your expert opinion.
I don't really have an answer, and I am pretty sure you know this. My assumption comes from observable images that seem to show segments of area that have been absolutely incinerated with surrounding areas seemingly untouched.
Modern houses are made with many man-made materials that burn far easier than natural materials and living trees. House fires can easily spread from house to house and with houses being highly flammable as they are, the results look consistent with that nature. The 4K drone footage that was released recently shows a view of the are that looks consistent with how a fire would go in a densely populated residential area with modern houses. Lots of trees were burned and all other vegetation smaller than a tree were completely gone in the burned areas. It doesn't line up with what people have claimed happened with vegetation being left untouched.
Are you claiming there is no foul play? Nothing to question here? It's a 'normal' fire and 'normal' fire behavior? Or are you the fire demolition expert that hasn't chimed in to explain to us retards how we're stupid for thinking that things exist that could produce these results and subsequently be used against us?
There was very likely foul play. That foul play doesn't require DEWs to explain it. Normal arson methods would have the same result and do not require space weapons to be accurately and selectively targeted. I'm not a fire expert, but I'm probably the most knowledgeable of Poalrs on the subject of lasers, microwave devices and their affects on materials. I have real world experience with high powered lasers in various wavelengths from far infrared to visible to deep ultraviolet. I have done much work in the field of laser optics and I know more than enough about the whole field to know that lasers make for some impractical death ray applications.
I would very much like to hear from some fire experts though because they are essential in knowing whether this is an unusual fire or not. I can't imagine they would be silent if they saw this result and thought it suspect. The silence of firefighters and fire researchers leads me to think that it is not so unusual. The only people saying it is unusual have no discernable expertise in any area related to this event and only have unverifiable photos and third-party accounts to base their claims on. I need more than that to be willing to entertain their claims.
To come out and denigrate others for not being an expert, please provide your expert opinion.
You're not the first person on Poal (or even previously Voat) where I have come in to challenge the claims of DEWs. For my knowledge, expertise and practical experience on the subject matter, I intervene because I want to find the real truth of these events and not have others sucked into conspiracy that only serves to help obscure the reality of the evil that has been undertaken. I've been called everything under the sun by those who desperately want the DEW technology to be capable of such things, but no one has been able to counter me when the real knowledge drops. I'm not a shill, glowie or dirty jew rat. I believe in truth and honesty and that evildoers deserve their untimely deaths. I am passionate about this topic because it hits very close to home for me in my field of work. I want to use my knowledge and expertise to help sort out the disinfo and put likeminded people who want to rid this world of corruption and evil on a path to that eventual inevitability. You don't have to believe me on anything. I encourage that, in fact. I want people to be skeptical of everything until they have gathered enough information from all sources so they can make up their own mind based on that disparate knowledge. Skepticism is our best tool for sorting out truth from lies. If all you take away from this is to become more skeptical of what is presented to you anywhere, then I did my part to help us all.
(post is archived)