A little over a minute in you can see the blue umbrellas.

So why did those umbrellas not burn? Fire doesn't care what color an object is. Are they flame retardant per city code perhaps? Of course the palm trees and small strip of grass they are next to also didn't burn even though they are not blue. How can that be explained?

This is what I've seen. https://pic8.co/sh/Cr2bov.png

Looks like a blue car virtually untouched. Now, it's from a video on a known CCP propagandist app. So there's that. But given all the other fuckery going on with this fire, it shouldn't be dismissed off hand.

I have seen that photo as well, but I cannot say that it is from Lahaina or even from any recent fire. There isn't enough context in the image to prove or disprove it's source so I can only be skeptical of it. One thing that does stand out here is that there are a lot of vehicles parked along a street on both sides that blocks any through traffic. That doesn't seem to be what would be expected for a residential neighborhood like Lahaina and the drone footage didn't show such things either. For that reason alone I am suspect of the nature of this photo.

Add to this the blue object versus laser weapon claim. The claim suggests that a laser weapon had to individually touch each object for it to burn. The supposed lack of effect on blue objects is claimed to be caused by lack of the light energy absorption at the laser's wavelength. Aside from that being a complete misunderstanding of how light absorption/reflection works, it would have been a very slow process to completely sweep the area of that size and individually wait for each object to burn/melt. A DEW would be used to start a fire not individually target objects. These cars would have been burned by normal fire in normal uncontrolled fire conditions. That's practical considering how much energy would have been needed to use a DEW for so long. There'd be evidence of such on everybody's Ring doorbell cameras and other security related cameras. Where's that footage?

At this point, it seems like this was a holocaust. There's thousands of children absent from schools in the area, allegedly, but just over 100 confirmed dead (any age).

I agree with this. Evil knows no bounds. The perpetrators and their masters must be made to suffer for their evil. Those children did not deserve to die at the hands of these demons.

As I've said, there's plenty of fuckery going on with this. Nothing should be dismissed because it doesn't fit someone's life experience with some portion of it.

Skepticism is extremely important in these trying times. Rather than not dismiss things because they don't line up with one's world view, I suggest taking all the information you can from as many sources as possible and compare and contrast them. Ask questions and challenge things instead of simply doing the opposite of what you said which is to accept things automatically if they fit your world view. Be skeptical of everything until you have enough information that you use to decide for yourself what you will call truth. Don't take anyone's opinion as your own until you have dome some work to find you own opinion. This goes for what I say here. Be skeptical of me as well but do it in such a way that you seek out to either debunk me or reinforce me. If you can do either and of your own volition and due diligence, then you have made your own opinion for yourself and you have backing for your position. I just want people to do some work to determine what is real and what is not. You may not find the truth, but you may find your independence from being influenced by those who seek to manipulate you. Either way that's a win in my book.