WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

1.5K

First: (((radio carbon dating))) Second: there's significant damage on the bottom of the Sphinx for example. The Sphinx is in the desert, that much damage would take insane amounts of water traveling at very high speeds. These ancient structures predate the Younger Dryas.

First: (((radio carbon dating))) Second: there's significant damage on the bottom of the Sphinx for example. The Sphinx is in the desert, that much damage would take insane amounts of water traveling at very high speeds. These ancient structures predate the Younger Dryas.

(post is archived)

[–] -1 pt

It seems like we have been made dumber, but that does not really support the claims made about what it must mean. Precision does not require alien technology, just clever craftsmanship. Cutting stone is very different depending on the hardness of the stone, and how brittle it is. All the evidence is presented out of context. Like a blurry video of lights in the sky purported to be alien ships.

[–] 0 pt

Placement and alignment of these structures relative to other planetary megaliths is more the feat I was referring to.

Secrets in plain sight (youtube.com) is a crazy long video series of a guy who goes around the world and measures stuff, to summarize. The shapes, angles, precise lines between old architecture across the planet are pretty undeniable once you've seen it

[–] 0 pt

First off the measurements are not as precise as they claim. Second, there is so much shit out there no matter how you place them they would line up with a bunch of random shit. Third, the techtonic plates have shifted, the earths orbit is not constant, the tilt of the earth wobbles, and any alignment now means it wasn't aligned back then.

If you look at close up pictures of the pyramids they are very irregular. These are not the precision structures that these people claim they are.