Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

106

First: (((radio carbon dating))) Second: there's significant damage on the bottom of the Sphinx for example. The Sphinx is in the desert, that much damage would take insane amounts of water traveling at very high speeds. These ancient structures predate the Younger Dryas.

First: (((radio carbon dating))) Second: there's significant damage on the bottom of the Sphinx for example. The Sphinx is in the desert, that much damage would take insane amounts of water traveling at very high speeds. These ancient structures predate the Younger Dryas.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (60).
[–] • -1 pt

Very little, very circumstantial evidence trying to make huge claims.

Lots of reasons to doubt. No metal. No technology. Small populations. Few monuments. Primitive buildings. Primitive infrastructure. No real evidence of world wide travel like artifacts from one civilization being found in another. No trade. No communication. Just a similarity in some architecture, which is so basic there is very little room for creative differences.

[–] • 4 pts

No real evidence of world wide travel like artifacts from one civilization being found in another.

Except there is. It all goes to the (((smithsoneon))) and is disappeared. Like the 7', 8', 9'+ skeletons with European haplogroups that were disappeared. You're uneducated and... ahahaha look (((who))) it is.

no trade

False.

no communication

False, look at a language tree and a map. Whites were in the Americas over 20,000 years ago, this is proven, known and extremely well established.

[–] • 2 pts

the level of precision in which many of these structures were built kinda suggests a higher awareness of physics/astronomy/mathematics/harmonics than we seem to have attained as a civilization today

[–] • -1 pt

It seems like we have been made dumber, but that does not really support the claims made about what it must mean. Precision does not require alien technology, just clever craftsmanship. Cutting stone is very different depending on the hardness of the stone, and how brittle it is. All the evidence is presented out of context. Like a blurry video of lights in the sky purported to be alien ships.

[–] • 0 pt

Placement and alignment of these structures relative to other planetary megaliths is more the feat I was referring to.

Secrets in plain sight (youtube.com) is a crazy long video series of a guy who goes around the world and measures stuff, to summarize. The shapes, angles, precise lines between old architecture across the planet are pretty undeniable once you've seen it

[–] • 0 pt

Interestingly, I recently learnt that there are boomerangs in the ancient Egyptian museum, these were called "foreigners weapon" by the dynastic Egyptians, and some of their maps point to a land formation that could be Australia. Then there are the Gosford Glyphs carved into some rock formations in Australia, recently translated and dated to the Ptolemaic / pre-Ptolemaic period. The hieroglyphs tell a story of a shipwrecked Egyptian flotilla.

Also, the "where is the metal" argument is easily discredited, and even archaeologist don't argue over this any more. Over history, any metal has typically been looted, melted down, and turned into weapons and armour. Far, far easier than mining and smelting.