WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

Agreed. It’s a standard release to send a contractor on site. If they dig a hole in your flower bed you can’t sue. I wouldn’t trust the results to be anything other than ambiguous, they will need their own samples and environmental tech company not affiliated for real results. Expect back a form letter saying all samples were within allowable limits without much detail.

[–] 3 pts

This is not a good contract for the home owner. I'd want them to request permission in advance before accessing the property. I'd also want the contract to sunset after some time period. Using this contract, NS could effectively confiscate evidence of their own malfeasance. For instance, they could take a dead pet off the property for analysis and then incinerate it as would be normal for a dead animal. In return they give you a report stating the pet died of natural causes, but you can't get a second opinion because the pet is now a pile of ash.

[–] 1 pt

Exactly. Had a similar thing happen once with a big company and faulty products. Mass recalls, no fault found, no payout, no evidence returned. Business as usual.