![Last night's "Super Flower Blood Moon" rising above the Temple of Poseidon in Greece before the lunar eclipse. [960x602 - 82KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/dsHxQW.jpg){kind=link}
Lots of time and labor can get almost anything done. Certain kinds of sand have hardness grades higher than granite, they used this plus water to do the final polishing.
Yet they can't replicate any of the precision using the same tools archeologists claim ancient Egyptians used along with the method of sanding with varying grits and water.
Napalm isn't Greek Fire.
The composition of Greek fire remains a matter of speculation and debate, with various proposals including combinations of pine resin, naphtha, quicklime, calcium phosphide, sulfur, or niter.
Why compare apples with oranges? Napalm is the modern EQUIVALENT of Greek Fire, almost certainly better.
That's hilarious. We can only speculate that it's a precursor and that Napalm is better. I bet modern architects also claim that modern architecture is better than ancient architecture too, which would be 100% complete bullshit
Modern chemists are certainly better than those of 5000 years ago. As for architecture, jews ruined it, but we know how to build structures like they used to be built, but it's too expensive, and there is a lack of demand for it.
(post is archived)