![Austin Texas [609x340 - 27KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/OzLHBs.jpg){kind=link}
This may not mean much, since I don't watch a lot of TV news, but I'm in Texas right now, and I haven't seen one hyper-ventilating word in the news on this. Odd.
They'd probably just ignore it.
That's what I'm saying. It takes a coordinated across-the-board effort to ignore something that thousands of people have already seen.
Like looking out at the TV audience and reporting "mostly peaceful protests" with store fires visibly burning in the background.
Exactly peaceful any other type of wrong think reporting would be racist.
Cults usually do.
We routinely used to annoy the fuck out of scientologist in Clearwater and they had a robotic response to it every time.
Look straight ahead make no eye contact it will all just go away.
It never did.
So one local NBC affiliate station reports it. But NBC doesn't pickup the story? Why not? That doesn't happen by accident.
NBC decided not to pick it up. And we already know that they all coordinate with each other which stories get run and which ones don't.
your question of "why not?" is obviously rhetorical; nevertheless I'll answer: THE JEWS.
anyhow:
Stick to the narrative or loose your funding goy!!
(post is archived)