![Too skimpy to fly on American Airlines [634x822 - 73KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/q0udmr.jpg){kind=link}
C'mon you fucking prudes. It's america, people can wear whatever they want. Yes, she has nice body. Is she a whore, maybe, but at least she don't have tattoos, green hair and planetary amount of fat. I would better share plane ride with her and her alike than with fat feminists, trans-degenerates and smelly sheboon niggers.
That's true but she's still dressed inappropriately for a flight kids might be on.
Oh, here we go again with this "save the children" bullshit.
She is still better role model for kids then these pedo-atrocities they see on TV and learn in communist schools filled with drag-queen faggots.
And pre-pubescent kids don't care about sex and sexual appeal, they mind their own childish business, of course if that isn't being shoveled in their throats by some thirsty pedophiles.
Lol you're afraid a kid in America is going to see a nip through a shirt. Meanwhile half the year is devoted to gays...
Dude give your head a shake. I'd rather them see a woman and like it then the constant gay stuff globohomo shoves
If a kids gonna be a faggot there's not much showing them soft porn like that chick will do about it. She's a little manish for my tastes anyways, I like woman soft and fit not bulging with muscles. I dunno about you but you could've shown me all that gay stuff 24/7 growing up and all that would've accomplished was making me dislike it that much more. I knew I liked titties when I was five and no amount of colorful clothes and dudes with their dick hanging out was going to change that. That said, no I don't think it's appropriate that kids, young kids, should see women with their nips poking out like that. I have daughters and never would've let them dress like that and I'd like to think I had something to do with them both marrying moral White men with good careers but who knows.
C'mon you fucking prudes. It's america, people can wear whatever they want.
And that's much of the problem, she's wearing a third as much clothing as I would consider to be appropriate loungewear for use at home yet she's allowed to go in public like this.
Even for actual pornography meant as a masturbatory aid a woman could be wearing a fair bit more clothing and it would still get the job done and this is coming from someone who lives somewhere women dress like her on a regular basis.
It's not anyone here's call to make.
(post is archived)