![Let's take a moment to acknowledge this healthy-looking motherfucker who stood up against global kiketry [576x615 - 54KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/NV8NbE.jpg){kind=link}
I'll admit I am doubting you on this.
If we're being frank, I think you're feigning ignorance on this topic just for the lulz.
No. I've heard hops make men feminized. This is modern understanding. My argument is pre-1900s. Do you have something showing pre-1900s understanding of this?!
I think you said it twice, so you must be convinced. I would like a link of supporting evidence, if you don't mind.
E: Also, I am not trying to show you up or anything. I really never heard of what you are saying. I would like to know.
No. I've heard hops make men feminized. This is modern understanding.
No, it is not, not unless several centuries ago counts as "modern".
I dunno bro, I suspect you're just being deliberately obtuse for the lulz. You've said that you looked up the history of the discovery of estrogen, but yet you won't look into this? Hmm.
No, it is not, not unless several centuries ago counts as "modern".
Depends on what is being talked about. For this context, modern is, meh, I don't fucking know, 1930s+.
Only reason I say that is because there is this awesome guy on youtube called Modern History and he is talking about armor and knights and shit. I made a joke about it being "modern" and some faggot historian on here or Voat lectured me that the Dark Ages is still considered "Modern."
Side note: The estrogen one was right on wiki on my first ten-second search. It wasn't hard. I am not finding the pre-1900s feminization shit you are talking about regarding hopps. Stop looking too deeply into me being a troll. Do you have the information or not?!
(post is archived)