You showed a picture, so I commented on the picture. If you want people to comment about an article you should say so, Mr. Communication Issues.
Sees title: "Modern day photo that looks like it was taken in the 1940s"
Begins to point out all the tech that didn't exist in the 1940s.
Totally misses the point that the photograph looks like it was captured with a 1940s camera.
Believes OP is the one with communication issues
lol
Bullshit. There is nothing in that picture that indicates anything about the device it was taken on. You are simply repeating something from the article.
fat fucking kek, my dude
I didn't even notice OP linked an article until you made a comment about it.
Haven't even clicked on it.
Reading the title is challenging, I know. I don't expect you to read the article, even if it is the Guardian.
A picture with modern cars as the focal point LOOKS LIKE IT WAS TAKEN IN THE 1940's!!!!!!
No, No it does not. It looks like it was taken TODAY. You seem to have perceptive and analytical issues.
Have you ever seen a photograph from the 1940s?
There's a definite similarity in the vignette, contrast, film grain, ...
You don't have an artistic bone in your body. Sad.
(post is archived)