Today, both jurisdictions would tax the owner.
They would order its destruction, citing code violations.
Also, have a bridge tax and charge you for tithes on traffic on the river.
This is what happens when you introduce jewish ideas to White people. This would never result in niggerland for the nigger is a master and slave to himself while Whites can be tricked into serving something other than self. The White Man, being the God who does not know himself will only serve Evil until he realizes that Judgment is his alone to bear.
Usury used to be a sin
Built over the river so that neither side could tax him?
HA!
I guarantee after it was built both jurisdictions simply taxed him for half of the structure.
Or both taxed him for the full structure.
It is the only complaint.
Taking from others - Evil.
Controlling others - Evil.
Seek not to steal from or control your brothers.
"Dont be evil."
Image macros are not appropriate content for /s/pics.
NO TEXT
No one says that...
when you have zero representation and a government constantly working to dispossess you of your homeland, it most certainly is theft.
Can't find any info about the taxation part, just that it was originally a bridge.
Well clearly they counted it as if it were on Ambleside
What idiot says its just a modern complaint?
![Taxation is Theft [1125x1649 - 214KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/umwKct.jpg){kind=link}
(post is archived)