Not calling for lone wolves, if you were to actually read my rants, you'd see that I directly address those as being bad things. What in calling for is a coordinated irl effort, acting as a large group, rather than as a small group of as individuals. One man armies won't accomplish anything, I've gone into detail about how you need to do things as a group. It doesn't matter how much guns you have, because its people who won fights, it matters how many people you have on your side. More often I've spoken about this in the context of the more often cited ideas of just doing nothing until they come to take your guns away from you, then going all one man army against the ones that come, but that's not going to end hat way you think it will. These people are experts at removing you from the equation and they are well staffed and equipped to do so. They know that the word of your deeds may cause issues for them down the line, so they employ their specialized expertise at making it so that your actions and experiences won't inspire others or serve as a warning to them. They can silence you by simply not reporting on you, they canoe and distort any truth that dies cone out in order to neutralize the threat to them that is being carried in the unaltered message. And there is so much more they can do. Last point I'd like to make is that whenever we found leaked orders or documents from paid shills, they are always being ordered to steer people on forums away from violent resistance never towards it. We've even got the people behind these campaigns straight up admitting to trying to make radical white nationalist groups less willing to takebvrwdical action against the system, amd they explicitly acknowledge that they do this by playing into the pre-existing culture of these sites. They play upon the paranoia to shut down irl action by accusing anyone who brings it up.as being a federal agent. This was the essence of the aptly named "Operation GLOW". They do the same with anyone who suggests the use of encrypted platforms, talking about how these platforms are run by jews and must be insecure, completely ignoring the fact that this goes tenfold for unencrypted networks like this one. Their telltale sign is that they suggest nothing useful or actionable, they exist only to shut down those who suggest ideas that could work where the status quo is achieving nothing. Qanon was one pf their most successful operations, appealing to the idea that you have to do nothing as the system just arrests its own bad actors, the ones who own the operate the system. They pretend rules on the books or moral standards ĺike consistency are somehow binding to those who face no consequences for straight up ignoring them, except when they are useful for prosecuting their opponents The thing about shills is that they are self sustaining, they can get regular anons to start to do their work for them. As I said, Hal Turner was the last provocateur, now that they have acquired the level of control of the government that they are currently operating on, they have no need to have an excuse to arrest you, they can simply arrest you and trust their puppets to manufacture the reasons for doing so. The people arent skeptical at all, no one will look into things, and everyone will accept the official story without questioning it. Believing that they need some justification to arrest you is yet another example of Qanon level idiocy, where they fail to realize that the only thing that had ever kept the enemy from doing anything was that there were consequences for doing so that made such moves like putting your own king into check while playing a game of chess. Now those restrictions are largely gone, they an act with impunity. Anyone who suggests that they need excuses anymore is either a shill or someone duped into accepting a shill dogma.