What are you? An organism composed of cells that were put together according to a genetic blueprint. What makes you who you are? You are not the cells, or the stuff that constitutes them, these are not unique. What is unique is the way that they were put together, your genes, your alleles, your genotype and phenotype. That is what makes the traits that define you are yourself. In the language of Hume's bundle theory, they are the properties that, bundled together, make up the object that is you. You, as a unique organism, are a unique bundle of traits that result from a unique bundle of genes, you are your genes and they are you. Genes, that is what you are. Environment also factors in, of course, but the manner in which your experiences affect you are determined by your genetic blueprint, an organism formed from another set of genetics would be affected differently by the same environmental experiences, thus, genes take precedence. A better way of putting it is that genes determine the range of possible ways in which you could be affected by your experiences, and your experiences determine where in that range you currently fall into. Why are you here? Because your father's sperm fertilized your mother's egg, and that union of sex cells was then placed through a series of environments that interacted with their genes to produce the you that you are now in the environment that you presently exist in, the process is still ongoing and will never end, even after you die, the manner in which your remnants continue on will be determined by the interaction of your genetics and environment. What is the purpose of your life? To aid the genes which you possess in propagating themselves. This can be done directly, through the act of reproduction, producing and then raising offspring who have inherited your genes, such that they would do the same, thus ensuring your genes make it two generations beyond your own. Or indirectly, through doing what you can to see that others who share the same genes as you do what is listed above, your family, your ethnicity, your race, your nation, etc. Your morality can be influenced by this purpose of living, for example, unlike what is seen in most systems of normative ethics, you do not see everyone as being indistinguishable, interchangeable, and expendable, you have a hierarchy relative to yourself, based on genetic similarity and generational difference. Do we have free will? No, your every mental and physical action is determined by your genetics and experiences, they can be predicted with perfect accuracy just from the perfect knowledge of these two factors and their interactions with themselves and each other. In times of crisis of conscience, such as a man who is torn between the urge to cheat on his wife and the urge to remain loyal to her, it is ultimately the result of two types of inherited genes which each code for a different strategy of survival and reproduction, in this case, one of pair bonding and quality offspring, and one of harems and numerous offspring. There's importance here, that what one does is in not different in any meaningful sense from what one is. You have as little choice in being racist against blacks, as they have in being black, it this is irrationally inconsistent to blame you for being racist, but not them for being the subject of your racism. A final lesson: You should see people not as beings, but as collection of genes, and focus your thoughts and behaviors towards genes, rather than the people they produce, organisms are nothing but vehicles for the survival and propagation of genes. A new approach is the one I propose, one that catches the enemy off guard, and places them into a battle they cannot win so easily (compared compared the one they are used and adapted to fighting). Switch targets from talking about race to talking about genetics, the rare and recessive traits should be focused on, rather than the (also endangered) white race, instead fight for the traits that they uniquely possess, express, and carry. In terms of effectiveness this strategy works. Also, a good ideology is adopting a modified version of Ayn Rand's philosophy, in that instead of the rational self interest of the individual organism, it's the interests of the genes which make the organism whose interest should be used as the basis of moral judgements. Thus the idea that was good in that it legitimized morality based on game theory, but bad in that it was focused on game theory centered around the good of a single player, is made wholly good, by setting up a standard by which one is playing the game on the behalf of the genes within the player, and thus places the actor on a team that can adjust itself according according the situation, rather than just a morality based on game theory, it is also incorporating hamiltons laws of kinship selection into the moral game, allowing for the formation of team alliances and rationally justifiable acts of altruism in accordance with those tribal relationships.