Leftist anarchists are not devoid of morality, nor are they anti-authority

665

•

You can hurt people, rape kids, do whatever, but they will have their limits where you do anything that offends their moral sensibilities, sometimes it's as easy as being born white and male, and not feeling bad about being either.

And they will have their hidden groups of centralized organization, such as a representative of their commune's (non-existent) workers, who will impose all manner of punishments upon you for crossing the lines of conduct that they say aren't there.

It's like in "rick and morty" where rick will say all manner of undermensch things like a denial of all morality and meaningfulness, then in the next he will fight the nazis, as if he has cause to be offended by them, but not by some serial killer for hire that he just sold a doomsday weapon to, you know, because he doesn't believe in morality.

They have different moral conventions, not a lack of them, and they have a different sense of ultimate meaningfulness and purpose, which is embodied in their ultimate quest for equity and equality, and they have higher authorities they believe in, which go even further than on the right, as they often have extremely complex caste systems of hierarchies, they also have beliefs in rituals and ceremonies that an outsider would describe as being religious, like taking a knee for black people, and the worship of a collection of saints and divine figures that even a catholic would find excessive.

They LARP as libertines, but are nothing of the sort, they cannot even truly be considered anarchists due to how they simply create leaderships and complex systems of authority that may as well be governments, that on top of having what may as well be laws against racism, sexism, and being unapologetic about being white and male.

Right wing anarchists, like anarcho capitalists or anarcho primitivists or anarcho egoists are the same, but they are at lrast honest about what they are and believe in.

An anarcho capitalist will tell you about the NAP and who will enforce it, the primitivist will tell you where they draw the line in terms of technology, and what happens to those who break these restrictions, the egoist will be upfront about what it means for their world of anything-goes social darwinism, and the underlying "rule of strength" and "will to power".

The difference between the left and right on the side of "anarchism" is that the right is honest, the left is a bunch of people who are either lying about what they actually support, or honestly unaware that they aren't actually what they claim to be.

Their morality is simply different from what most people's conception, they sell the idea that they are without rules or laws or leaderships, but all you gotta do is say something racist around them or break another of their various rules and you will find that they have moral principles, they are fucking lying when they say they don't. You can hurt people, rape kids, do whatever, but they will have their limits where you do anything that offends their moral sensibilities, sometimes it's as easy as being born white and male, and not feeling bad about being either. And they will have their hidden groups of centralized organization, such as a representative of their commune's (non-existent) workers, who will impose all manner of punishments upon you for crossing the lines of conduct that they say aren't there. It's like in "rick and morty" where rick will say all manner of undermensch things like a denial of all morality and meaningfulness, then in the next he will fight the nazis, as if he has cause to be offended by them, but not by some serial killer for hire that he just sold a doomsday weapon to, you know, because he doesn't believe in morality. They have different moral conventions, not a lack of them, and they have a different sense of ultimate meaningfulness and purpose, which is embodied in their ultimate quest for equity and equality, and they have higher authorities they believe in, which go even further than on the right, as they often have extremely complex caste systems of hierarchies, they also have beliefs in rituals and ceremonies that an outsider would describe as being religious, like taking a knee for black people, and the worship of a collection of saints and divine figures that even a catholic would find excessive. They LARP as libertines, but are nothing of the sort, they cannot even truly be considered anarchists due to how they simply create leaderships and complex systems of authority that may as well be governments, that on top of having what may as well be laws against racism, sexism, and being unapologetic about being white and male. Right wing anarchists, like anarcho capitalists or anarcho primitivists or anarcho egoists are the same, but they are at lrast honest about what they are and believe in. An anarcho capitalist will tell you about the NAP and who will enforce it, the primitivist will tell you where they draw the line in terms of technology, and what happens to those who break these restrictions, the egoist will be upfront about what it means for their world of anything-goes social darwinism, and the underlying "rule of strength" and "will to power". The difference between the left and right on the side of "anarchism" is that the right is honest, the left is a bunch of people who are either lying about what they actually support, or honestly unaware that they aren't actually what they claim to be.

(post is archived)