Wow. You really made a great effort. You should repost it somewhere else where it's more appropriate for everyone to see.
Anyway, Nietzsche was not a genius, because he was unable to understand that between the superman and the subhuman there is 90% of average people. He divided humans only in superior and inferior. Also, he wrote that the superman has no morale, which is obviously based on jewish religion.
>Also, he wrote that the superman has no morale
That's an over simplification
https://medium.com/the-sophist/nietzsche-finding-your-superhumanity-8a2b8e7e5bdb
>The Overman creates its own values that are driven by “supreme achievement”, as opposed to being “good” in the moral sense.
And it doesn't stop there
>The philosopher made references to historical figures when discussing the Overman. He suggested in correspondence that the German polymath Goethe came close to being one, suggesting that the Overman is a creator. But he also mentioned the statesmen Cesare Borgia (who likely inspired Machiavelli’s The Prince) and Napoleon Bonaparte, both of whom were dangerously amoral.
What's moral, in the end? What's the moral choice, in the end?
In the end.
Read Cesare Lombroso and Gregory Klimov. They explained everything.
I don't need an explanation
What are moral values and principles, that inevitably lead to the very destruction of your own people in the end?
A fatal flaw.
(post is archived)