You'd probably only get a shallow pleasure from it. It's introductory, and I'm sure you know all of the material already. But it's concise and to the point, and it hits some interesting points about the 'middle path'. If I post a video, I don't ever expect people to watch it. An hour-long video is a commitment, especially when it's not pure entertainment. Additionally, I'm a weirdo that would put something like this on while I'm doing something else. I won't get every point made, but I kind of enjoy just having the lecture going in the background while I'm doing some menial task.
Lectures are great for background noise; interesting points will be absorbed.
And refreshing my knowledge is always a good thing. It's been a while since I've read Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics so maybe I will be reminded of some of the interesting excess-virtue-deficiency examples - like how with good humour there is buffoonery and prudishness.
I can't remember if I mentioned this to you - I think I mentioned it to @ARM once when he said Christianity contains no meaningful symbolism - but Christ being crucified between two thieves is a representation of the Golden Mean.
when he said Christianity contains no meaningful symbolism
I don't remember saying that.
It was part of your attempts to argue Hinduism's superiority. Something about how Maya sits on Dharma or something, and how totally deep that is compared to anything in Christianity. I think you were speaking of Christianity as conceived by the world rather than Christianity as I hope you now at least recognize it is.
(post is archived)