I don't mean to be dismissive, but you just don't seem to be saying much of substance. I don't "get" what the point is that you're trying to make. You acknowledge the "One", okay. But then you seem confused about the nature of language, reasoning, and truth - a kind of "all perceivables are illusions", a Hindu maya taken to an extreme.
Not only is it uninteresting, but untenable. If the universe is not intelligible and man cannot apprehend the Logos, then all discussion and thought is vain - a position which would invalidate all belief, including the belief in that very vanity.
I don't mean to be dismissive, but you just don't seem to be saying much of substance. I don't "get" what the point is that you're trying to make. You acknowledge the "One", okay. But then you seem confused about the nature of language, reasoning, and truth - a kind of "all perceivables are illusions", a Hindu maya taken to an extreme.
Not only is it uninteresting, but untenable. If the universe is not intelligible and man cannot apprehend the Logos, then all discussion and thought is vain - a position which would invalidate all belief, including the belief in that very vanity.
(post is archived)