Yes but calling it "Child Porn" not only makes it seem less serious for the creators, distributors and possessors of it but it belittles what's actually happening to the child. So yes it's true that it's horrible no matter the label, using a proper label for it's serious nature can't be overstated.
It's about language, and language matters FAR more than people seem to realize or want to accept. jews' control of language gives them far more power than usury does and that's saying something.
Ive been saying the same thing for years about language. I agree that it should be labeled by something far more accurate to describe how horrible it is and the people that consume/produce it.
Language is everything. It can even change how a person thinks. I had a few posts earlier today where they said things like "unhoused". No. Its not Unhoused, its HOMELESS. Same with describing "unwanted sexual contact". Nope again, that is called SEXUAL ASSAULT.
If you are not already aware of it, look into "neuro linguistic programming".
Keep it up.
(post is archived)