OK, let's now assume he's directly involved with the drug cartels.
What's the point in funding such movie that would bring attention to them?
OK, let's now assume he's directly involved with the drug cartels. What's the point in funding such movie that would bring attention to them?
The only benefit to the (((DS))) is if the movie and people making it can be totally discredited in order to make the subject of trafficking appear to be a ficticious conspiracy theory. Possibly a side plot to make the movie a honey pot to attract like minded conservatives to show themselves, get involved with it - in order to destroy them and the effort.
I don't think Carlos Slim is directly working with the cartels - or if he is, he doesn't want to be. I could more easily believe he is disgusted with their trafficking and in this way has passively helped to expose it - though I may be projecting my own values on Slim with that line of thought.
The trafficking is real. The movie is based on actual events. The (((DS))) worked to suppress the movie without being overly obvious about it. MSM came out of the woodwirk to protect MAPs and label the movie a ficticious conspiracy theory after its release. Trump has now aligned himself with the movie after the launch via Mar-a-lago viewing. All indicators appear to show this movie is over the target.
I get where you're going, but might wanna take a look at the megathread:
I posted an update:
Sound Of Freedom MegaThread - The connection between NCMEC, Polaris, Clinton Foundation and Sound of Freedom, and Flynn network. Apparently their goal is to get kids chipped.
I left a comment there. I don't have the time to do a deep dive on the new set of assertions in the megathread. I hate threads like that which create heavy implications based on sketchy details. They are often fast and loose with their facts. There may be truth to it, but I'm not convinced until I see irrefutable proof supporting their assertions or a near future result (a heavy push by the usual bad actors to chip kids like pets) that validates their whole theory.
If the theory that Sound of Freedom was a (((DS))) creation gains any real traction, one of the big name anons will do a deep dive with receipts. I just don't have the free time to chase it all down. The timing and structure of the theory do trigger my spidey senses as being potential disinfo/misinfo ... so the assertions and allegations deserve close scrutiny. If their theory is proven true, it will be mindblowing.
(post is archived)