Well he can stop funding to the park. That's 100% within his power. "Lose the nude beach or stay closed forever." Public parks are no place for nude beaches anyway. Period!
He could introduce legislation. "He tried one time" is not an excuse.
He could draft an exective order. Which, in Florida, does not require legislative approval but instead is bound by the Administrative Procedure Act.
He has lots of options. His inaction proves he's an enabler.
Well he can stop funding to the park. That's 100% within his power.
True, he can ask the legislature to stop funding state parks. Plenty of part are county-funded. Also, the FL legislature is not nearly as 'conservative' as you'd think.
"He tried one time" is not an excuse.
I did not say he tried one time. I said that if I remembered correctly, he tried to get the legislature to do it. I don't know how hard or how many times.
He could draft an exective order. Which, in Florida, does not require legislative approval but instead is bound by the Administrative Procedure Act.
If true, this would be the best way for him to remove state funding to parks that allow nudity in front of children. I'm surprised none of his handlers thought if this. It's all about the optics for them. I'd have to look into it, but you could very well be correct.
His inaction proves he's an enabler.
Maybe we can force him to act.
Maybe we can force him to act.
True. If enough citizens were to start complaining they would at the very least have to acknowledge it.
(post is archived)