WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Lmao what?

You didn’t understand what the y-axis label meant.

That doesn’t make the person who made the chart retarded, it makes you retarded. Pretty much everyone here understood this graph except you, you should not be in charge of people whose job it is to present information if you think this simple chart is nonsense.

It literally shows per capita data using 100% as the baseline for expectation per race but you somehow think it’s something separate from per capita rates

[–] 0 pt

Lmao what?

You didn’t understand what the y-axis label meant.

No, you didn't. They mislabeled Y-Axis because that was actually the parenthetical attribute on the x-axis. Thanks for playing, though. And, yup, you're confirmed retarded.

[–] 0 pt

Holy fuck. Actually retarded.

Whoever made this chart added extra information below the x-axis to make it easier for illiterate people to understand. And you still don’t understand it.

The inclusion of additional parenthetical data below the x-axis does not change what is being represented on the y-axis.

Holy Jesus, people actually submit things to you for review?

[–] 0 pt

And you still don’t understand it.

And yet...I did. I did so thoroughly that I saw what they were trying to do and determined why they are retarded/pretty sophomoric in their approach. I understand their retardedness.

Also, you don't understand the point I just made because you're also retarded. It's still going over your head. I won't repeat myself.

Holy Jesus, people actually submit things to you for review?

Yes but it is even worse: I'm published and do stats and research for a living.