Why not? At least get a reduced sentence. Pedos need to be killed on site.
So a guy drunk drives and murders a White family of 5, gets 65 years in prison or whatever and kills a pedo, he should now not serve for his murder of a White family? You're retarded, that's why.
He's on the right track though. Killing pedos should reduce the overall sentence by a few years on a case by case basis.
No. No he is not. It's a ludicrous premise. You commit a crime you pay for it. Period. You may not intend to be, and I don't think so necessarily, but you're advocating for (((Weimar))) policies with this.
Sentences shouldn't be reduced based on shit like this.
Special treatment, like "you get one extra hour of TV per day, per pedophile you murder while in prison" could work. Before you know it, all of the most violent guys would be watching TV 24 hours a day, and there'd be hundreds of dead pedos.
Hmmm..... you do raise a good point. Original crime must be considered and in this case I will stand corrected it should not be reduced. But the additional sentence should not have been imposed.
Sure a guy in prison for writing a blank check that kills a pedo, let him out. However the reasoning for that more has to do with the charge of writing a blank check being jewish and bullshit than it does him getting rid of the pedo. He shouldn't have been there in the first place.
(post is archived)