There’s lot of redundancy in this post.
There’s lot of redundancy in this post.
Jews. Talmud. Pedophiles.
Jews. Talmud. Pedophiles.
I truly hope it doesn't try to claim that muh jews are muh 12 tribes and not the same as the jews of israel.
I really don't.
Because that's wrong.
The jews are and always have been pharisees. This is gone over in The Holy Bible. Rev 3:9 is all you need. The 12 tribes is stolen from 12 tribes of Judea which was a Christian nation. Any translation of the bible which says "jews" rather than "pharisees" or "judeans" is intentionally mistranslated by jews to mislead. Jesus isn't jewish. Jesus is Judean.
I truly hope it doesn't try to claim that muh jews are muh 12 tribes and not the same as the jews of ~~israel~~.
I really don't.
Because that's wrong.
The jews are and always have been pharisees. This is gone over in The Holy Bible. Rev 3:9 is all you need.
The 12 tribes is stolen from 12 tribes of Judea which was a Christian nation.
Any translation of the bible which says "jews" rather than "pharisees" or "judeans" is intentionally mistranslated by jews to mislead.
Jesus isn't jewish.
Jesus is Judean.
Then why was fictional Jesus schooled by Rabbis? Why was fictional hero Jesus circumcized? Why was Talmudist-Abrahamic mind slavery used to enslave the Irish during the potato famine? It's obvious psychological conquering. White people can do better than have a hero that is tortured, killed on a stick, and comes back to life but doesn't kick ass. So sick of "humble" white people. Rise up. God is dead, bitches
Then why was fictional Jesus schooled by Rabbis? Why was fictional hero Jesus circumcized? Why was Talmudist-Abrahamic mind slavery used to enslave the Irish during the potato famine? It's obvious psychological conquering. White people can do better than have a hero that is tortured, killed on a stick, and comes back to life but doesn't kick ass. So sick of "humble" white people. Rise up. God is dead, bitches
inspired the spin-offs including: the OT, christianity, Islam, and maybe freemasonry
inspired the spin-offs including: the OT, christianity, Islam, and maybe freemasonry
The OT and Christianity are both older than the Talmud by hundreds of years.
The OT and Christianity are both older than the Talmud by hundreds of years.
The OT is pre-flood (Younger Dryas Event), which makes the oldest parts more than 11,800 years old.
The Talmud is the recording of much of the Pharisee's oral tradition. Mentioned in the NT. Judaism was formalized with the Tulmud. As such, in order of official dated ages, Christianity, Judaism, and then Islam is the ordering by oldest. Islam is roughly the same age as Judaism. IMOHO, was also their work to create a competing religion. Both satanic religions from the same people.
The OT is pre-flood (Younger Dryas Event), which makes the oldest parts more than 11,800 years old.
The Talmud is the recording of much of the Pharisee's oral tradition. Mentioned in the NT. Judaism was formalized with the Tulmud. As such, in order of official dated ages, Christianity, Judaism, and then Islam is the ordering by oldest. Islam is roughly the same age as Judaism. IMOHO, was also their work to create a competing religion. Both satanic religions from the same people.
What you are suggesting is definitely a possibility, and something that I often wonder about.
What you are suggesting is definitely a possibility, and something that I often wonder about.
u got a sauce for that claim? OT and New Testes are anonymously written, not dated older than the Babylonian Talmud.
u got a sauce for that claim? OT and New Testes are anonymously written, not dated older than the Babylonian Talmud.
I mean, wikipedia says the babylonian talmud was compiled in 500 a.d. by my calculations that is 500 years after the events of the NT, which are really the beginning of christianity. Even assuming the latest possible date of 324 a.d. for the NTs compilation it is still 150 years difference.
I mean, wikipedia says the babylonian talmud was compiled in 500 a.d. by my calculations that is 500 years after the *events* of the NT, which are really the beginning of christianity. Even assuming the latest possible date of 324 a.d. for the NTs compilation it is still 150 years difference.
(post is archived)