WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

107

(post is archived)

[–] 9 pts

Porn and degeneracy is freely available to children. Guns are not. However, Mr. Steinberg, lets continue the conversation about limiting children's access to porn. Let's start with identifying who owns these porn websites.

[–] 6 pts

You missed what the grabbler was trying to do. He didn't say porn, he said child porn. He wants people to legalize kiddie porn.

[–] 2 pts

Point still applies. Who runs these child porn sites? We know who.

[–] 5 pts (edited )

Why did that nigger put his guns on the asphalt?

[–] 1 pt

Photographic effect, and he's retarded.

[–] 1 pt

One is used to protect children. The other exploits them. The very premise of his title/question is stupid AF to begin with.

[–] 1 pt

Ah yes, the inalienable God-given right to rape children, which the Founding Fathers wisely recognized as essential to a free society. How can people guarantee their liberty if they can't even look at child porn?

People like this are just not capable of intelligent conversation on such topics. Wish they'd just fuck off to Europe or China or whatever cuckland they aspire to.

[–] 1 pt

I really hope the day of the rope is in our near future. If not we are all fucked.

Restricted? Porn?

Porn is essentially on tap. You can access it anywhere that you have cell phone bars. This kike is a liar.

How do they always find a way to be wrong from any possible angle? It's almost as if it's a troll.

[–] 1 pt

We limit our const. rights...

Nope. Constitution strictly prohibits obscenity. Which includes all (((porn))). It's extremely clear.

[–] 1 pt

I don’t think porn should be considered free speech. Printed or spoken words of thoughts and beliefs are speech but not all images should be considered it.