Porn is a mind-virus to all humans.
Porn is a mind-virus to all humans.
If being happy right after doing something is the standard for judging harm then smoking crack must be great for you! Are they going to come out and advocate for children to smoke crack next?
Also the "hurt durr sex education" excuse is even more ridiculous. Porn is basically the opposite of sex education. Anyone who has had literally any sex can tell you professional porn is a completely unrealistic, edited product. You might as well try to learn about fruit from eating fruit loops.
If being happy right after doing something is the standard for judging harm then smoking crack must be great for you! Are they going to come out and advocate for children to smoke crack next?
Also the "hurt durr sex education" excuse is even more ridiculous. Porn is basically the opposite of sex education. Anyone who has had literally any sex can tell you professional porn is a completely unrealistic, edited product. You might as well try to learn about fruit from eating fruit loops.
You're a crackphobic bigot. How can you not support giving kids crack in [current year]. How else are they supposed to forget about prostituting themselves to gay men in a child drag queen show?
You're a crackphobic bigot. How can you not support giving kids crack in [current year]. How else are they supposed to forget about prostituting themselves to gay men in a child drag queen show?
You can't be bigoted against crack, it disproportionately harms black people, because it's racist. Don't you dare bring up some statistic about who uses it more!
You can't be bigoted against crack, it disproportionately harms black people, because it's racist. Don't you dare bring up some statistic about who uses it more!
"Not always" like what? 99% of the time it's harmful?
>A UN agency is again immersed in controversy for a recent report suggesting there is no conclusive evidence that children exposed to pornography are harmed.
Pfff... It's worse than the title implies... They stated they found no evidence they were armed... Like "well since there's no evidence... it's all good!!!!Wohooooo!!!"
So now I guess it's perfectly fine to expose kids to gay bondage rough sex porn... What about stuffs with animals while we're at it? It's porn...
I mean what are we talking about here, what kind of porn are they talking about? This study is a sham, no one would put bambi and madmax on the same page just because it's "movies", same deal
>The report published by the UN Children’s Fund (UNICEF) addresses how government policy can be used to protect children from harmful, abusive and violent content online. Its conclusion is based on a European study of 19 EU countries that found in most countries, most children who saw pornographic images were “neither upset nor happy.” In fact, the report UNICEF relies on says 39 percent of Spanish children were happy after seeing pornography.
So... Are they saying they exposed children to porn here for a scientific experiment?... Because it sounds like exactly that...
...
I've seen a blowjob on a crypted channel for about 3 secs when I was 10 or something, I still remember the sequence... Nothing traumatic but my brain kept it in memory for all those years... So I guess it's safe to say that this information was kind of very "impactful"
...
In pedo cases also, the victim, the child, isn't always "traumatized", and that's where the worst part begins, the fact that they enjoyed it, that they experienced pleasure, make them look for it when they reach adulthood and the pedo cycle repeats...
Not traumatized my ass
"Not always" like what? 99% of the time it's harmful?
>>A UN agency is again immersed in controversy for a recent report suggesting there is no conclusive evidence that children exposed to pornography are harmed.
Pfff... It's worse than the title implies... They stated they found no evidence they were armed... Like "well since there's no evidence... it's all good!!!!Wohooooo!!!"
So now I guess it's perfectly fine to expose kids to gay bondage rough sex porn... What about stuffs with animals while we're at it? It's porn...
I mean what are we talking about here, what kind of porn are they talking about? This study is a sham, no one would put bambi and madmax on the same page just because it's "movies", same deal
>>The report published by the UN Children’s Fund (UNICEF) addresses how government policy can be used to protect children from harmful, abusive and violent content online. Its conclusion is based on a European study of 19 EU countries that found in most countries, most children who saw pornographic images were “neither upset nor happy.” **In fact, the report UNICEF relies on says 39 percent of Spanish children were happy after seeing pornography.**
So... Are they saying they exposed children to porn here for a scientific experiment?... Because it sounds like exactly that...
...
I've seen a blowjob on a crypted channel for about 3 secs when I was 10 or something, I still remember the sequence... Nothing traumatic but my brain kept it in memory for all those years... So I guess it's safe to say that this information was kind of very "impactful"
...
In pedo cases also, the victim, the child, isn't always "traumatized", and that's where the worst part begins, the fact that they enjoyed it, that they experienced pleasure, make them look for it when they reach adulthood and the pedo cycle repeats...
Not traumatized my ass
UNICEF: For those difficult times when you run out of firewood for the bonfire.
UNICEF: For those difficult times when you run out of firewood for the bonfire.
(post is archived)