Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

1.1K

I have watched two (youtube.com) videos (youtube.com) about debunking the idea that Prince Harry's actual biological father is James Hewitt. At some points these two roboticallly voiced videos appear to have the same parts in their respective scripts. Does the Royal Family use robots to control the narrative? Are they highlighting some rumors to distract from others? Why is Elizabeth the least talked about despite being the one sitting on the throne?

I have watched [two](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0VpzU51dHM) [videos](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OrM4q0yHUiU) about debunking the idea that Prince Harry's actual biological father is James Hewitt. At some points these two roboticallly voiced videos appear to have the same parts in their respective scripts. Does the Royal Family use robots to control the narrative? Are they highlighting some rumors to distract from others? Why is Elizabeth the least talked about despite being the one sitting on the throne?

(post is archived)

[–] • 1 pt

I thought BBC stood for Busty Benedict Cumberbatch. A sort of in joke for the royal tranny family cabal members who are populating Hollywood with their cockney-talking gender bender nationals.

[–] • 1 pt

That's a fine point! Benedict Cumberbatch is such an odd name only tranny satanists could make it up.