It would also confirm to me she was turned, as I've suspected, to the RNC's breakaway side, as the Pelosi are the only ones with the combination of cunning and opportunity to turn hunter Biden against Joe (that's what all the material on the news about him has been. Hunters been turned against his dad). U.s pentagon neutral faction cant beat the DNC run by the chinese, nor the RNC run the Zionists. So the next best step is for them to shoot down Pelosi's plane and blame on the chinese and start a war. Theres several reasons for this: 1. If the u.s. military waits too long, they risk china advancing far enough to finally pose a nonnuclear threat. 2. On the other hand, theres the risk if the u.s. waits too long, collapse or regime change occurs in china and the u.s. weapons industry misses out on *gargantuan* profits from a war. 3. Domestic issues need a distraction and they know serious full scale lockdowns are both insufficient and likely to finally lead to major confrontation with the public, so that's a non starter. 4. Of the two most significant threats, the Zionist faction of the regime, and the chinese faction, the pentagon considers the chinese a more immediate threat. That's not my opinion, that's likely theirs though. Why is anyone's guess. Maybe because the people running the pentagon arent about to consider *themselves* a threat. 5. By eliminating polosi, it strengthens the chinese faction of the u.s Government, which greatly weakens the dominant party of the regime, in favor of the non dominant party, the Zionists. In other words, Pelosi continuing to love, threatens the stability, unity, and power of the DNC. Which is likely why trump went soft on her over her orchestration of the J6. That's looking at the bigger picture. Because the chinese are intent on using the Biden regime, which is really Obama's third term, as a trojan horse to wreck the u.s. before world war, the Pentagon and intelligence agency's thinking is that by killing pelosi, they can *prevent* her from "interrupting the enemy whole they're making a mistake". Its political advantage-seeking, realpolitik, at the expense of the united states. Their thinking if the DNC is allowed to continue, things will geybad enough that the potential conflict or political disruption will put the pentagon or the Zionists back in charge before it gets *beyond* fixing. Whereas gaining power now, while the dominant party oc the regime still remains, dying, but viable, will mean a long drawn out slog of a political and economic war while dealing with a dangerous, wounded, and cornered political faction internally. Which means the u.s., after killing pelosi, is very likely *not* going to fire any missiles first. Instead the u.s Will play the high ground, and immediately accuse china. If china takes the bait, and responds in any way besides to take credit, then they lose. Why? Because then if china denies it, the u.s. will turn around and claim Xi is scared of a fight, and will use this as propaganda to destabilize china internally. Its counter intuitive but makes sense. To project strength the u.s will make a provocative statement that is untrue, and which they hope china will reflexively deny. By taking credit for it, china will say to the world, "we just declared war, your move america." Knowing fill well china would be innocent if pelosi was killed by the u.s military. Effectively, as long as china *just* talks, there should be no meaningful response from the u.s, i.e. no actual missiles launched. The u.s. will try to say it is justified, but wont want to be the first to launch, and will hope china backs down. This is also likely the actual reason for moving our carrier groups with pelosi. An attack on her, would justify occupying Taiwan without it being considered a direct provocatoon. U.s. military kills her,blames china, it gets its excuse. But if china calls the bluff by taking credit, now the threat of china becomes 'real' to the american public. And then military occupation of Taiwan by the u.s, loses support with the american public. Even if the u.s. military *wants* her alive, it greatly benefits even the *existing* regime in the u.s., to have her dead. It would be an enormous gift to china, who could escalate in a way that appeases their population *without* invading taiwan too hastily, while being able to divide the american public on support of a potential war, which with fresh u.s.naval groups in and around taiwan, would make war look increasingly likely. Finally, this is just what I see, as an analysis of the current news, and should not be construed as a threat.